H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Chuck Adams vs Alex Antonitsch H2H: 0-1
Alex Antonitsch holds a 1–0 lead over Chuck Adams in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Antonitsch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Antonitsch won the 1989 Charleston third round 6-4 2-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1989* | Charleston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Antonitsch | 6-4 2-6 7-6 | Chuck Adams | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,789 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alex Antonitsch | #1,272 | #40 | 586 | 1,820 | 100 | 133 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Alex Antonitsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #172 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #519 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |