Chuck Adams
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Chuck Adams vs David Rikl H2H: 0-1
David Rikl holds a 1–0 lead over Chuck Adams in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Rikl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1996 ASB Classic round of 16 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Rikl | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Chuck Adams | Match data | Jan 12, 1996* | R16 | ASB Classic | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,790 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,687 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Chuck Adams | David Rikl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1991 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1992 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1993 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1994 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1994 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 24 | 1995 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 25 | 1996 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 68 | 66 | 134 | 50.7% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | — | 13 | 32 | 45 | 28.9% | 32 | 46 | 78 | 41.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Chuck Adams | David Rikl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1477 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -0.84 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.05 | 1989 | 1504 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.28 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1489 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.33 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1990 | 1492 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1574 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.38 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.24 | 1991 | 1474 | 99.3 | -0.87 | -1.37 | 0.804 | 47.8% | +55 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.56 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1586 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.55 | 0–5 (0%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | +1.11 | 1992 | 1503 | 110.9 | -3.14 | -0.80 | 0.856 | 47.2% | — | +80 | — | 41.4% | -0.90 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–1 | — | +0.71 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1697 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -235 | -174 | 52.3% | +0.10 | 8–13 (38%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | -0.71 | 1993 | 1532 | 121.2 | -2.57 | -0.92 | 0.837 | 46.7% | -53 | +80 | — | 37.0% | -1.04 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +0.11 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1736 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -304 | -159 | 50.8% | -0.04 | 8–5 (62%) | 9–10 (47%) | — | -0.79 | 1994 | 1536 | 126.2 | -2.08 | -2.48 | 0.847 | 47.1% | -44 | +135 | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–12 (29%) | — | +0.69 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1693 | 114.2 | — | — | — | — | +57 | -259 | — | 54.5% | -0.55 | 2–0 | 6–1 (86%) | — | +1.01 | 1995 | 1534 | 123.3 | -1.30 | -0.19 | 0.959 | 49.3% | -48 | +102 | — | 42.0% | -0.48 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +0.78 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1619 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +1.07 | 1996 | 1529 | 123.0 | -3.53 | -0.97 | 0.843 | 46.6% | -13 | +41 | — | 39.0% | -0.89 | 3–9 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +0.07 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1578 | 115.2 | -1.18 | +1.34 | 0.921 | 48.9% | -56 | — | +29 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.27 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1565 | 98.3 | -0.24 | +1.75 | 1.063 | 50.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 |
| Career | — | 1790 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -266 | -167 | 48.6% | -0.15 | 25–32 (44%) | 39–39 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.05 | — | 1687 | 125.9 | -2.34 | -1.19 | 0.867 | 47.4% | -37 | +85 | +29 | 39.5% | -0.81 | 15–30 (33%) | 19–25 (43%) | 91.8 | +2.03 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
David Rikl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 25, 1994 | H2H |
| Jiri Novak | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 11, 1996 | H2H |
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 29, 1994 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 29, 1997 | H2H |