H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Chuck Adams vs David Witt H2H: 1-0

Chuck Adams holds a 1–0 lead over David Witt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chuck Adams leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1993 Antwerp round of 32 6-2 6-2.

USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chuck Adams #66 6-2 6-2 David Witt #128 Match data Nov 11, 1993* R32 Antwerp ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chuck Adams #1,366 #34 933 1,790 83 93 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
David Witt #1,466 #128 331 1,601 15 23 39.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chuck Adams David Witt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 0–1 0.0% #553 1,483 0 0
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #417 1,476 0 0 1991 2–4 33.3% #275 1,503 0 0
19 1990 2–3 40.0% #193 1,489 0 0 1992 0–2 0.0% #216 1,480 0 0
20 1991 10–12 45.5% #117 1,573 0 0 1993 5–7 41.7% #176 1,509 0 0
21 1992 9–15 37.5% #112 1,586 0 0 1994 6–5 54.5% #158 1,588 0 0
22 1993 25–25 50.0% #69 1,696 0 1 1995 0–1 0.0% #778 1,572 0 0
23 1994 26–24 52.0% #44 1,735 0 1
24 1995 6–5 54.5% #224 1,692 0 1 1997 2–1 66.7% #205 1,593 0 0
25 1996 5–7 41.7% #278 1,618 0 1 1998 0–2 0.0% #533 1,568 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chuck Adams David Witt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 2 4 6 33.3%
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1993 20 16 36 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 20 15 35 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1995 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1996 5 7 12 41.7% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 68 66 134 50.7% 1 11 12 8.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 11 14 21.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chuck Adams David Witt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1483 99.7 0.0% -2.67 +0.08
18 1989 1477 102.1 16.7% -0.84 0–1 0–2 +0.05 1991 1504 123.3 +0.21 -0.48 0.971 50.1% +31 47.1% -0.18 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) -0.49
19 1990 1489 106.0 +43 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 +0.35 1992 1480 98.8 +1.42 -1.66 0.825 46.7% 20.0% -1.40 0–1 +0.11
20 1991 1574 124.7 +39 44.2% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–5 (38%) -0.24 1993 1509 106.9 -2.35 -2.24 0.745 45.0% -44 +115 41.4% -0.93 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) +0.39
21 1992 1586 122.1 +32 42.9% -0.55 0–5 (0%) 9–6 (60%) +1.11 1994 1589 119.3 +0.59 +0.23 1.024 50.8% +2 +39 50.0% +0.13 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) -0.09
22 1993 1697 140.4 +48 -235 -174 52.3% +0.10 8–13 (38%) 11–11 (50%) -0.71 1995 1573 97.2 -2.13 -0.13 0.471 40.4% 0.0% -3.00 +0.06
23 1994 1736 140.3 +27 -304 -159 50.8% -0.04 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) -0.79
24 1995 1693 114.2 +57 -259 54.5% -0.55 2–0 6–1 (86%) +1.01 1997 1594 105.7 -0.82 +0.11 0.848 47.1% +11 50.0% -0.25 +0.18
25 1996 1619 115.7 +42 47.2% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) +1.07 1998 1569 104.5 -2.56 -0.33 0.546 39.1% 0.0% -2.80 0–1 -0.10
Career 1790 136.5 +38 -266 -167 48.6% -0.15 25–32 (44%) 39–39 (50%) 99.0 +1.05 1602 117.7 -0.45 -0.57 0.866 47.8% +1 +7 +77 40.0% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 6–5 (55%) 102.7 +0.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.