H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Chuck Adams vs Ivan Lendl H2H: 1-1
Chuck Adams and Ivan Lendl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1994 Schenectady fourth round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1994* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Chuck Adams | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Ivan Lendl | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Ivan Lendl | 2-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Chuck Adams | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,789 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Ivan Lendl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 |