H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Chuck Adams vs Ivan Lendl H2H: 1-1

Chuck Adams and Ivan Lendl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1994 Schenectady round of 16 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chuck Adams
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chuck Adams #70 7-6(5) 6-4 Ivan Lendl #29 Match data Aug 26, 1994* R16 Schenectady ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Ivan Lendl #7 2-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 Chuck Adams #130 Match data Sep 6, 1992* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chuck Adams #1,366 #34 933 1,790 83 93 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chuck Adams Ivan Lendl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #417 1,476 0 0 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0
19 1990 2–3 40.0% #193 1,489 0 0 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0
20 1991 10–12 45.5% #117 1,573 0 0 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7
21 1992 9–15 37.5% #112 1,586 0 0 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17
22 1993 25–25 50.0% #69 1,696 0 1 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32
23 1994 26–24 52.0% #44 1,735 0 1 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39
24 1995 6–5 54.5% #224 1,692 0 1 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42
25 1996 5–7 41.7% #278 1,618 0 1 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53
26 — — — — — — — 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62
27 — — — — — — — 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70
28 — — — — — — — 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73
29 — — — — — — — 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83
30 — — — — — — — 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88
31 — — — — — — — 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91
32 — — — — — — — 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92
33 — — — — — — — 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94
34 — — — — — — — 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chuck Adams Ivan Lendl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1991 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4%
21 1992 9 14 23 39.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
22 1993 20 16 36 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0%
23 1994 20 15 35 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7%
24 1995 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5%
25 1996 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 68 66 134 50.7% 1 11 12 8.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chuck Adams Ivan Lendl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1989 1477 102.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -0.84 0–1 0–2 — +0.05 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27
19 1990 1489 106.0 — — — — +43 — — 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51
20 1991 1574 124.7 — — — — +39 — — 44.2% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.24 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38
21 1992 1586 122.1 — — — — +32 — — 42.9% -0.55 0–5 (0%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.11 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33
22 1993 1697 140.4 — — — — +48 -235 -174 52.3% +0.10 8–13 (38%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.71 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79
23 1994 1736 140.3 — — — — +27 -304 -159 50.8% -0.04 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.79 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88
24 1995 1693 114.2 — — — — +57 -259 — 54.5% -0.55 2–0 6–1 (86%) — +1.01 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71
25 1996 1619 115.7 — — — — +42 — — 47.2% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +1.07 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40
Career — 1790 136.5 — — — — +38 -266 -167 48.6% -0.15 25–32 (44%) 39–39 (50%) 99.0 +1.05 — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.