H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Chuck Adams vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 4-0
Chuck Adams holds a 4–0 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chuck Adams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1995 Auckland quarterfinal 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1995* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Chuck Adams | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1994* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Chuck Adams | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1994* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Chuck Adams | 6-3 6-3 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1992* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Chuck Adams | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,789 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Jakob Hlasek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 |