H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Chuck Adams vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 4-0

Chuck Adams holds a 4–0 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chuck Adams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1995 ASB Classic quarterfinal 7-6(5) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chuck Adams
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chuck Adams #43 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Jakob Hlasek #69 Match data Jan 14, 1995* QF ASB Classic ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Chuck Adams #68 7-6(4) 7-5 Jakob Hlasek #69 Match data Nov 10, 1994* R32 Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Chuck Adams #69 6-3 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #49 Match data Jul 20, 1994* R64 Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Chuck Adams #133 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Jakob Hlasek #28 Match data Aug 19, 1992* R64 New Haven ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chuck Adams #1,366 #34 933 1,790 83 93 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chuck Adams Jakob Hlasek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #417 1,476 0 0 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1990 2–3 40.0% #193 1,489 0 0 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0
20 1991 10–12 45.5% #117 1,573 0 0 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0
21 1992 9–15 37.5% #112 1,586 0 0 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0
22 1993 25–25 50.0% #69 1,696 0 1 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0
23 1994 26–24 52.0% #44 1,735 0 1 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2
24 1995 6–5 54.5% #224 1,692 0 1 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3
25 1996 5–7 41.7% #278 1,618 0 1 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4
26 — — — — — — — 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chuck Adams Jakob Hlasek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1991 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
21 1992 9 14 23 39.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
22 1993 20 16 36 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1994 20 15 35 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3%
24 1995 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4%
25 1996 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0%
Career — 68 66 134 50.7% 1 11 12 8.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chuck Adams Jakob Hlasek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29
18 1989 1477 102.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -0.84 0–1 0–2 — +0.05 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84
19 1990 1489 106.0 — — — — +43 — — 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04
20 1991 1574 124.7 — — — — +39 — — 44.2% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -0.24 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17
21 1992 1586 122.1 — — — — +32 — — 42.9% -0.55 0–5 (0%) 9–6 (60%) 98.6 +1.11 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10
22 1993 1697 140.4 — — — — +48 -235 -174 52.3% +0.10 8–13 (38%) 11–11 (50%) 96.6 -0.71 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72
23 1994 1736 140.3 — — — — +27 -304 -159 50.8% -0.04 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) 103.3 -0.79 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83
24 1995 1693 114.2 — — — — +57 -259 — 54.5% -0.55 2–0 6–1 (86%) — +1.01 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85
25 1996 1619 115.7 — — — — +42 — — 47.2% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.2 +1.07 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84
Career — 1790 136.5 — — — — +38 -266 -167 48.6% -0.15 25–32 (44%) 39–39 (50%) 99.0 +1.05 — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.