H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Chuck Adams vs Jim Grabb H2H: 3-1
Chuck Adams holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chuck Adams leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1995 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1995* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Chuck Adams | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1994* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chuck Adams | 7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1993* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chuck Adams | 6-4 7-6(5) | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1992* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | Chuck Adams | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,789 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |