H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Chuck Adams vs Jim Grabb H2H: 3-1

Chuck Adams holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chuck Adams leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1995 Indian Wells Open round of 64 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chuck Adams
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chuck Adams #41 7-6(3) 6-2 Jim Grabb #72 Match data Mar 8, 1995* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Chuck Adams #69 7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 Jim Grabb #131 Match data Jul 21, 1994* R32 Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Chuck Adams #93 6-4 7-6(5) Jim Grabb #52 Match data Feb 11, 1993* R32 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Jim Grabb #77 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 Chuck Adams #154 Match data Apr 8, 1992* R64 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chuck Adams #1,366 #34 933 1,790 83 93 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chuck Adams Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #417 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 2–3 40.0% #193 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 10–12 45.5% #117 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1992 9–15 37.5% #112 1,586 0 0 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1993 25–25 50.0% #69 1,696 0 1 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1994 26–24 52.0% #44 1,735 0 1 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1995 6–5 54.5% #224 1,692 0 1 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1996 5–7 41.7% #278 1,618 0 1 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chuck Adams Jim Grabb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 9 14 23 39.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 20 16 36 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1994 20 15 35 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1995 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1996 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 68 66 134 50.7% 1 11 12 8.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chuck Adams Jim Grabb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1989 1477 102.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -0.84 0–1 0–2 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1489 106.0 — — — — +43 — — 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1574 124.7 — — — — +39 — — 44.2% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1586 122.1 — — — — +32 — — 42.9% -0.55 0–5 (0%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.11 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16
22 1993 1697 140.4 — — — — +48 -235 -174 52.3% +0.10 8–13 (38%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.71 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05
23 1994 1736 140.3 — — — — +27 -304 -159 50.8% -0.04 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.79 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31
24 1995 1693 114.2 — — — — +57 -259 — 54.5% -0.55 2–0 6–1 (86%) — +1.01 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31
25 1996 1619 115.7 — — — — +42 — — 47.2% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +1.07 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
Career — 1790 136.5 — — — — +38 -266 -167 48.6% -0.15 25–32 (44%) 39–39 (50%) 99.0 +1.05 — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.