Chuck Adams
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Luiz Mattar holds a 4–0 lead over Chuck Adams in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Luiz Mattar leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Luiz Mattar won the 1994 Toulouse round of 32 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Chuck Adams | Match data | Oct 6, 1994* | R32 | Toulouse | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Luiz Mattar | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Chuck Adams | Match data | Feb 26, 1994* | QF | Scottsdale | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Luiz Mattar | 1-6 7-5 7-6(3) | Chuck Adams | Match data | Jan 16, 1993* | QF | ASB Classic | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Luiz Mattar | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Chuck Adams | Match data | Nov 14, 1992* | QF | Sao Paulo | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,790 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,766 | 176 | 163 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #51 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,697 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,594 | 0 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1987 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1995 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1996 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 68 | 66 | 134 | 50.7% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | — | 83 | 69 | 152 | 54.6% | 71 | 76 | 147 | 48.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1477 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -0.84 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1489 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.33 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1574 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.38 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 1586 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.55 | 0–5 (0%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | +1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 1697 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -235 | -174 | 52.3% | +0.10 | 8–13 (38%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | -0.71 | 1986 | 1567 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +30 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.15 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1736 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -304 | -159 | 50.8% | -0.04 | 8–5 (62%) | 9–10 (47%) | — | -0.79 | 1987 | 1697 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -71 | — | 52.8% | -0.01 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +3.23 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1693 | 114.2 | — | — | — | — | +57 | -259 | — | 54.5% | -0.55 | 2–0 | 6–1 (86%) | — | +1.01 | 1988 | 1679 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +52 | — | 52.9% | +0.34 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.58 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1619 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +1.07 | 1989 | 1682 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -25 | — | 57.4% | +0.47 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–12 (33%) | — | +3.17 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1697 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -53 | — | 54.5% | +0.21 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.59 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1633 | 123.3 | -1.11 | -1.85 | 0.913 | 48.4% | +52 | -31 | -104 | 43.6% | -0.59 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.26 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1714 | 131.8 | +1.84 | -1.25 | 1.026 | 50.5% | -3 | -41 | — | 51.5% | -0.02 | 10–6 (63%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.94 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1691 | 135.1 | -0.37 | -1.77 | 0.899 | 48.5% | +48 | -70 | — | 47.1% | -0.39 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.03 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1698 | 127.3 | -0.05 | -2.01 | 0.916 | 48.3% | +15 | -47 | — | 49.4% | -0.17 | 8–1 (89%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1594 | 111.7 | -2.46 | -4.96 | 0.713 | 45.6% | +20 | — | — | 22.7% | -1.64 | 0–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.33 |
| Career | — | 1790 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -266 | -167 | 48.6% | -0.15 | 25–32 (44%) | 39–39 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.05 | — | 1766 | 133.5 | -0.11 | -1.94 | 0.921 | 48.7% | +20 | -30 | -104 | 50.4% | -0.07 | 62–47 (57%) | 62–60 (51%) | 104.7 | +2.25 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1994 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 19, 1994 | H2H |
| Alberto Mancini | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 28, 1993 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 14, 1994 | H2H |