H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chuck Adams vs Mark Petchey H2H: 0-1
Mark Petchey holds a 1–0 lead over Chuck Adams in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Petchey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Petchey won the 1994 Miami Masters first round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1994* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Mark Petchey | 6-3 7-5 | Chuck Adams | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,789 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Mark Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |