H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Chuck Adams vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-0

Chuck Adams holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chuck Adams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1994 Canadian Open round of 64 3-6 6-2 6-3.

USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chuck Adams #67 3-6 6-2 6-3 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jul 27, 1994* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chuck Adams #1,366 #34 933 1,790 83 93 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Martin Damm Sr 1,731 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Chuck Adams Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–2 0.0% #417 1,476 0 0
1990 2–3 40.0% #193 1,489 0 0
1991 10–12 45.5% #117 1,573 0 0
1992 9–15 37.5% #112 1,586 0 0
1993 25–25 50.0% #69 1,696 0 1
1994 26–24 52.0% #44 1,735 0 1
1995 6–5 54.5% #224 1,692 0 1
1996 5–7 41.7% #278 1,618 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Chuck Adams Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
1990 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
1991 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 2 1 3 66.7%
1992 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1993 20 16 36 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1994 20 15 35 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1995 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1996 5 7 12 41.7% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
2002 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 68 66 134 50.7% 1 11 12 8.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 11 9 20 55.0% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Chuck Adams Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1989 1477 102.1 16.7% -0.84 0–1 0–2 +0.05 1989 1492 98.3 0.0% -5.00 -0.08
1990 1489 106.0 +43 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 +0.35 1990 1478 98.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.15
1991 1574 124.7 +39 44.2% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -0.24 1991 1504 104.7 +57 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 +0.21
1992 1586 122.1 +32 42.9% -0.55 0–5 (0%) 9–6 (60%) 98.6 +1.11 1992 1546 125.4 +65 -88 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1993 1697 140.4 +48 -235 -174 52.3% +0.10 8–13 (38%) 11–11 (50%) 96.6 -0.71 1993 1647 128.4 +28 -196 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1994 1736 140.3 +27 -304 -159 50.8% -0.04 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) 103.3 -0.79 1994 1630 133.5 -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1995 1693 114.2 +57 -259 54.5% -0.55 2–0 6–1 (86%) +1.01 1995 1619 133.0 +8 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1996 1619 115.7 +42 47.2% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.2 +1.07 1996 1709 139.5 +35 -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1997 1694 135.4 +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1998 1649 132.2 +16 +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1999 1578 123.5 +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2000 1615 127.5 -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2001 1514 96.3 +91 15.0% -1.90 0–2 +0.77
2002 1525 111.4 +15 37.5% -0.75 1–1 -0.13
Career 1790 136.5 +38 -266 -167 48.6% -0.15 25–32 (44%) 39–39 (50%) 99.0 +1.05 Career 1732 136.6 +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.