H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Chuck Adams vs Neil Borwick H2H: 1-0

Chuck Adams holds a 1–0 lead over Neil Borwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chuck Adams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1993 Seoul round of 16 6-1 6-2.

USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
AUS Age 58 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chuck Adams #90 6-1 6-2 Neil Borwick #134 Match data Apr 23, 1993* R16 Seoul ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chuck Adams #1,366 #34 933 1,790 83 93 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Neil Borwick #1,150 #104 441 1,662 25 50 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chuck Adams Neil Borwick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #417 1,476 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% #506 1,493 0 0
19 1990 2–3 40.0% #193 1,489 0 0
20 1991 10–12 45.5% #117 1,573 0 0 1988 1–1 50.0% #597 1,497 0 0
21 1992 9–15 37.5% #112 1,586 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #162 1,486 0 0
22 1993 25–25 50.0% #69 1,696 0 1 1990 1–4 20.0% #189 1,482 0 0
23 1994 26–24 52.0% #44 1,735 0 1 1991 2–8 20.0% #173 1,450 0 0
24 1995 6–5 54.5% #224 1,692 0 1 1992 7–5 58.3% #176 1,555 0 0
25 1996 5–7 41.7% #278 1,618 0 1 1993 13–15 46.4% #112 1,628 0 0
26 1994 1–14 6.7% #242 1,460 0 0
27 1995 0–1 0.0% #400 1,444 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chuck Adams Neil Borwick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1991 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 20 16 36 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 20 15 35 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 1996 5 7 12 41.7% 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1994 0 10 10 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 68 66 134 50.7% 1 11 12 8.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 19 34 53 35.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chuck Adams Neil Borwick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1989 1477 102.1 16.7% -0.84 0–1 0–2 +0.05 1986 1493 102.2 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 -0.07
19 1990 1489 106.0 +43 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 +0.35
20 1991 1574 124.7 +39 44.2% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–5 (38%) -0.24 1988 1497 100.9 50.0% +1.00 +0.15
21 1992 1586 122.1 +32 42.9% -0.55 0–5 (0%) 9–6 (60%) +1.11 1989 1487 99.0 0.0% -2.50 +0.01
22 1993 1697 140.4 +48 -235 -174 52.3% +0.10 8–13 (38%) 11–11 (50%) -0.71 1990 1482 107.2 +50 25.0% -1.75 -0.24
23 1994 1736 140.3 +27 -304 -159 50.8% -0.04 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) -0.79 1991 1451 110.2 -1.64 -1.98 0.867 47.8% +37 30.4% -0.83 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) +0.43
24 1995 1693 114.2 +57 -259 54.5% -0.55 2–0 6–1 (86%) +1.01 1992 1556 115.3 +0.44 -2.86 0.919 48.6% -9 +53 55.2% -0.17 3–2 (60%) 5–1 (83%) +0.81
25 1996 1619 115.7 +42 47.2% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) +1.07 1993 1629 133.0 +1.41 -0.53 1.029 50.7% +23 -69 44.1% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 4–9 (31%) +0.31
26 1994 1460 99.4 -3.82 -4.41 0.701 44.4% +9 17.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) +0.74
27 1995 1444 94.4 -3.26 -1.55 0.561 39.4% 0.0% -3.67 +0.09
Career 1790 136.5 +38 -266 -167 48.6% -0.15 25–32 (44%) 39–39 (50%) 99.0 +1.05 1663 119.9 -0.56 -2.13 0.888 48.2% +20 +1 36.5% -0.75 9–14 (39%) 13–14 (48%) 99.0 +2.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.