Chuck Adams
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Chuck Adams and Shuzo Matsuoka are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shuzo Matsuoka leads 1–0 on clay, while Chuck Adams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1996 New Haven round of 32 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | 6-3 6-4 | Shuzo Matsuoka | Match data | Aug 15, 1996* | R32 | New Haven | Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
| Shuzo Matsuoka | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | Chuck Adams | Match data | May 20, 1993* | R32 | Bologna | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,790 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 155 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Shuzo Matsuoka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Shuzo Matsuoka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1991 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1988 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 21 | 1992 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1993 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1990 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1994 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1991 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1995 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1996 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 68 | 66 | 134 | 50.7% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | — | 84 | 98 | 182 | 46.2% | 7 | 17 | 24 | 29.2% | 23 | 18 | 41 | 56.1% | 13 | 22 | 35 | 37.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Shuzo Matsuoka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1484 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1477 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -0.84 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.05 | 1986 | 1488 | 115.9 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 25.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.18 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1489 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.33 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1987 | 1485 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | +50 | — | — | 30.0% | -0.40 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.11 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1574 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.38 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–5 (38%) | 100.1 | -0.25 | 1988 | 1637 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -128 | — | 47.1% | -0.24 | 2–6 (25%) | 6–9 (40%) | 95.2 | -1.46 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1586 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.55 | 0–5 (0%) | 9–6 (60%) | 98.6 | +1.11 | 1989 | 1573 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 42.0% | -0.98 | 2–3 (40%) | 7–4 (64%) | 101.0 | +1.13 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1696 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -234 | -173 | 52.3% | +0.10 | 8–13 (38%) | 11–11 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.71 | 1990 | 1583 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 47.4% | -0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.5 | +0.54 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1736 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -304 | -159 | 50.8% | -0.04 | 8–5 (62%) | 9–10 (47%) | 103.3 | -0.79 | 1991 | 1629 | 133.0 | +1.75 | -1.11 | 1.030 | 50.8% | +20 | -126 | -64 | 53.4% | +0.34 | 8–7 (53%) | 8–8 (50%) | 100.8 | +1.52 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1693 | 114.2 | — | — | — | — | +57 | -259 | — | 54.5% | -0.55 | 2–0 | 6–1 (86%) | — | +1.01 | 1992 | 1725 | 139.5 | +4.24 | -0.99 | 1.078 | 51.7% | -24 | -226 | -44 | 53.2% | +0.21 | 7–7 (50%) | 7–6 (54%) | 106.4 | -1.88 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1619 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 94.2 | +1.07 | 1993 | 1674 | 124.0 | +1.90 | -2.99 | 0.965 | 49.7% | +4 | -120 | -22 | 50.0% | -0.04 | 5–4 (56%) | 11–4 (73%) | 106.5 | +0.77 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1627 | 134.9 | +2.64 | -1.49 | 1.029 | 50.3% | -9 | — | +33 | 44.6% | -0.13 | 1–8 (11%) | 5–8 (38%) | 91.0 | -1.46 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1706 | 136.1 | +2.95 | -1.36 | 1.027 | 50.5% | -63 | — | +51 | 53.4% | +0.03 | 5–9 (36%) | 13–8 (62%) | 103.3 | -1.75 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1576 | 127.9 | -0.31 | -1.95 | 0.894 | 48.5% | +20 | -69 | +174 | 40.7% | -0.40 | 4–8 (33%) | 7–14 (33%) | 92.8 | -0.24 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1581 | 109.2 | +0.61 | -1.20 | 0.956 | 47.8% | +16 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.07 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1561 | 97.2 | -1.03 | -3.75 | 0.701 | 43.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| Career | — | 1790 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -266 | -166 | 48.6% | -0.15 | 25–32 (44%) | 39–39 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.05 | — | 1822 | 137.1 | +2.15 | -1.59 | 1.001 | 50.2% | +2 | -126 | +27 | 47.7% | -0.17 | 39–58 (40%) | 68–65 (51%) | 99.6 | -0.97 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Woodforde | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 12, 1996 | H2H |
| MaliVai Washington | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 7, 1996 | H2H |
| Emilio Sanchez | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 15, 1992 | H2H |
| Todd Woodbridge | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 10, 1997 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 7, 1995 | H2H |