Chuck Adams
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Stefan Edberg holds a 1–0 lead over Chuck Adams in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1993 Tokyo Indoor round of 32 7-6(9) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 7-6(9) 7-6(6) | Chuck Adams | Match data | Oct 14, 1993* | R32 | Tokyo Indoor | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,790 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,237 | 748 | 248 | 75.1% | 6 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 21 | 41 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,130 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,124 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,208 | 2 | 15 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #5 | 2,077 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,154 | 3 | 20 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,175 | 4 | 27 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,147 | 5 | 33 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 64–20 | 76.2% | #2 | 2,035 | 6 | 36 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,873 | 6 | 40 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,827 | 6 | 41 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,887 | 6 | 41 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% |
| 19 | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% |
| 20 | 1991 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1986 | 32 | 5 | 37 | 86.5% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% |
| 21 | 1992 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 42 | 5 | 47 | 89.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% |
| 22 | 1993 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1988 | 28 | 9 | 37 | 75.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% |
| 23 | 1994 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1989 | 29 | 7 | 36 | 80.6% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% |
| 24 | 1995 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 39 | 5 | 44 | 88.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% |
| 25 | 1996 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 39 | 7 | 46 | 84.8% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 32 | 6 | 38 | 84.2% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 31 | 9 | 40 | 77.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 26 | 11 | 37 | 70.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| Career | — | 68 | 66 | 134 | 50.7% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | — | 380 | 104 | 484 | 78.5% | 110 | 48 | 158 | 69.6% | 98 | 26 | 124 | 79.0% | 160 | 70 | 230 | 69.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1464 | 96.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.62 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.35 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1617 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -20 | -83 | 52.8% | +0.21 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.10 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1477 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -0.84 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.05 | 1984 | 1826 | 153.7 | — | — | — | — | -28 | -162 | -156 | 60.9% | +0.75 | 5–7 (42%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | -0.06 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1489 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.33 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1985 | 2130 | 166.9 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -335 | -173 | 72.7% | +1.45 | 7–8 (47%) | 19–14 (58%) | — | -3.55 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1574 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.38 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.24 | 1986 | 2125 | 164.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -250 | -162 | 69.7% | +1.52 | 18–7 (72%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | -1.90 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1586 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.55 | 0–5 (0%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | +1.11 | 1987 | 2209 | 172.3 | — | — | — | — | +77 | -360 | -99 | 77.7% | +1.92 | 13–3 (81%) | 19–16 (54%) | — | -3.18 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1697 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -235 | -174 | 52.3% | +0.10 | 8–13 (38%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | -0.71 | 1988 | 2077 | 159.9 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -199 | +95 | 72.3% | +1.37 | 14–8 (64%) | 16–8 (67%) | — | -2.31 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1736 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -304 | -159 | 50.8% | -0.04 | 8–5 (62%) | 9–10 (47%) | — | -0.79 | 1989 | 2155 | 169.3 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -186 | +7 | 73.0% | +1.25 | 10–5 (67%) | 18–9 (67%) | — | -6.13 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1693 | 114.2 | — | — | — | — | +57 | -259 | — | 54.5% | -0.55 | 2–0 | 6–1 (86%) | — | +1.01 | 1990 | 2176 | 173.1 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -272 | +103 | 74.5% | +1.68 | 16–1 (94%) | 19–10 (66%) | — | -4.50 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1619 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +1.07 | 1991 | 2148 | 168.6 | +6.92 | +5.37 | 1.372 | 55.2% | +61 | -218 | +146 | 78.7% | +1.85 | 12–7 (63%) | 18–9 (67%) | — | -1.02 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2036 | 166.3 | +5.64 | +3.53 | 1.246 | 53.7% | +37 | -92 | +216 | 68.9% | +1.22 | 17–10 (63%) | 29–14 (67%) | — | +0.13 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1987 | 165.8 | +3.09 | +4.76 | 1.184 | 52.9% | +16 | +31 | +233 | 67.6% | +1.11 | 15–9 (63%) | 24–13 (65%) | — | -2.70 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1874 | 159.8 | +4.24 | +3.69 | 1.218 | 53.6% | +60 | +64 | +297 | 67.4% | +1.26 | 11–10 (52%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | +1.11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1827 | 152.9 | +1.63 | +3.73 | 1.143 | 52.1% | +69 | +91 | +198 | 60.3% | +0.83 | 12–7 (63%) | 13–7 (65%) | — | +0.90 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1888 | 152.3 | +2.04 | +3.83 | 1.139 | 52.1% | -26 | +12 | +184 | 60.6% | +0.82 | 9–9 (50%) | 13–17 (43%) | — | -2.82 |
| Career | — | 1790 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -266 | -167 | 48.6% | -0.15 | 25–32 (44%) | 39–39 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.05 | — | 2237 | 168.9 | +4.15 | +4.19 | 1.222 | 53.4% | +27 | -108 | +46 | 69.9% | +1.32 | 161–95 (63%) | 235–156 (60%) | 102.1 | -2.58 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boris Becker | 10 | 22 | 32 | Jun 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 14 | 13 | 27 | Sep 11, 1992 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 12 | 9 | 21 | Aug 3, 1996 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 9 | 11 | 20 | Jul 27, 1995 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 15 | 4 | 19 | Aug 26, 1993 | H2H |