Chuck Adams
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Chuck Adams vs Todd Larkham H2H: 1-0
Chuck Adams holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Larkham in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chuck Adams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1996 Australian Open round of 128 6-4 6-7(4) 6-7(2) 6-3 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-7(2) 6-3 9-7 | Todd Larkham | Match data | Jan 17, 1996* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,790 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Todd Larkham | #1,466 | #136 | 274 | 1,607 | 3 | 14 | 17.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Todd Larkham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #189 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #167 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Todd Larkham | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1997 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1998 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 68 | 66 | 134 | 50.7% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | — | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Todd Larkham | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1477 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -0.84 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 1489 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.33 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1574 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.38 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 1586 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.55 | 0–5 (0%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | +1.11 | 1996 | 1479 | 106.0 | -1.47 | -1.25 | 0.720 | 43.1% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.71 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.04 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1697 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -235 | -174 | 52.3% | +0.10 | 8–13 (38%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | -0.71 | 1997 | 1494 | 111.1 | -0.73 | -1.04 | 0.572 | 40.8% | +1 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.13 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.50 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1736 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -304 | -159 | 50.8% | -0.04 | 8–5 (62%) | 9–10 (47%) | — | -0.79 | 1998 | 1486 | 107.5 | -1.57 | +0.52 | 0.834 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.30 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.28 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1693 | 114.2 | — | — | — | — | +57 | -259 | — | 54.5% | -0.55 | 2–0 | 6–1 (86%) | — | +1.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 1619 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +1.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1475 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1464 | 108.4 | +1.68 | +1.01 | 0.619 | 41.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.33 | — | — | — | -0.18 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1566 | 110.5 | -2.83 | -1.03 | 0.705 | 42.5% | -49 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.30 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1563 | 110.3 | +1.88 | +4.34 | 0.680 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.33 | — | — | — | -0.27 |
| Career | — | 1790 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -266 | -167 | 48.6% | -0.15 | 25–32 (44%) | 39–39 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.05 | — | 1607 | 116.4 | -1.29 | -0.30 | 0.679 | 42.6% | -24 | — | — | 29.8% | -1.63 | 0–5 (0%) | 3–3 (50%) | 94.5 | -5.47 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Todd Larkham
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 21, 2004 | H2H |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 11, 2003 | H2H |
| James Blake | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 25, 2003 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 28, 2003 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 17, 2003 | H2H |