Chuck Adams
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Chuck Adams and Todd Woodbridge are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1993 Seoul final 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | 6-4 6-4 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data | Apr 25, 1993* | F | Seoul | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Todd Woodbridge | 7-6(4) 7-6(7) | Chuck Adams | Match data | Feb 12, 1992* | R64 | Memphis | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,790 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,870 | 239 | 231 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #54 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 20 | 1991 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1991 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
| 21 | 1992 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1993 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1993 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1994 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1994 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 24 | 1995 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1996 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 68 | 66 | 134 | 50.7% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | — | 146 | 131 | 277 | 52.7% | 21 | 32 | 53 | 39.6% | 43 | 31 | 74 | 58.1% | 29 | 37 | 66 | 43.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Chuck Adams | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1453 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +59 | — | — | 21.1% | -1.53 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.38 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1477 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -0.84 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.05 | 1989 | 1573 | 126.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | — | 44.1% | -0.68 | 2–0 | 5–2 (71%) | — | -0.39 |
| 19 | 1990 | 1489 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.33 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1990 | 1705 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -177 | — | 47.3% | -0.16 | 8–7 (53%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.3 | -0.46 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1574 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.38 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–5 (38%) | 100.1 | -0.24 | 1991 | 1704 | 135.7 | -0.60 | +1.97 | 0.996 | 49.9% | -11 | -147 | -95 | 48.4% | -0.03 | 5–3 (63%) | 9–8 (53%) | 102.3 | -0.95 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1586 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.55 | 0–5 (0%) | 9–6 (60%) | 98.6 | +1.11 | 1992 | 1676 | 141.7 | -0.77 | +2.88 | 1.047 | 51.0% | +48 | -130 | -62 | 49.2% | +0.12 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–13 (46%) | 101.7 | -0.18 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1697 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -235 | -174 | 52.3% | +0.10 | 8–13 (38%) | 11–11 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.71 | 1993 | 1665 | 133.1 | -2.39 | +1.69 | 0.971 | 49.6% | +31 | -91 | -53 | 46.4% | -0.11 | 8–6 (57%) | 5–6 (45%) | 99.9 | -0.10 |
| 23 | 1994 | 1736 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -304 | -159 | 50.8% | -0.04 | 8–5 (62%) | 9–10 (47%) | 103.3 | -0.79 | 1994 | 1662 | 123.5 | -1.35 | -0.55 | 0.931 | 48.8% | +6 | -162 | +27 | 46.2% | -0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 8–10 (44%) | 100.1 | +1.36 |
| 24 | 1995 | 1693 | 114.2 | — | — | — | — | +57 | -259 | — | 54.5% | -0.55 | 2–0 | 6–1 (86%) | — | +1.01 | 1995 | 1811 | 136.8 | +0.19 | +0.89 | 0.983 | 49.6% | -41 | -183 | -91 | 54.0% | +0.06 | 6–6 (50%) | 13–7 (65%) | 104.8 | -2.85 |
| 25 | 1996 | 1619 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 94.2 | +1.07 | 1996 | 1754 | 142.3 | -1.66 | +2.21 | 0.980 | 49.9% | +8 | -93 | +11 | 56.4% | +0.32 | 7–4 (64%) | 16–12 (57%) | 105.8 | +0.28 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1801 | 143.6 | -0.92 | +3.35 | 1.040 | 50.8% | -19 | -148 | +69 | 58.1% | +0.40 | 7–5 (58%) | 12–9 (57%) | 102.4 | -0.11 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1717 | 136.8 | -3.37 | +1.99 | 0.923 | 48.5% | +12 | -51 | +123 | 46.8% | -0.22 | 12–2 (86%) | 6–12 (33%) | 100.6 | -0.66 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1603 | 123.7 | -0.75 | -0.98 | 0.870 | 47.8% | +69 | -37 | +208 | 35.5% | -0.95 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | 100.5 | +0.58 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1589 | 116.3 | -2.34 | +1.34 | 0.976 | 49.6% | +38 | — | — | 48.3% | -0.24 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.9 | -0.13 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1598 | 112.4 | -2.79 | +0.59 | 0.950 | 48.9% | -17 | — | +231 | 43.3% | -0.37 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.55 |
| Career | — | 1790 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -266 | -167 | 48.6% | -0.15 | 25–32 (44%) | 39–39 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.05 | — | 1870 | 141.5 | -1.32 | +1.70 | 0.980 | 49.7% | +10 | -122 | +24 | 49.1% | -0.07 | 79–58 (58%) | 102–93 (52%) | 106.9 | -0.57 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 20, 1994 | H2H |
| Alex Obrien | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 16, 1996 | — |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 8, 1995 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 14, 1995 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Oct 6, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | 3 | 14 | 17 | Oct 10, 1998 | H2H |
| Jason Stoltenberg | 5 | 5 | 10 | Jan 10, 1998 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 10, 1999 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Jan Siemerink | 5 | 2 | 7 | Aug 16, 2000 | H2H |