H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Chuck Adams vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-0

Chuck Adams holds a 2–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chuck Adams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1996 Memphis round of 64 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chuck Adams
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chuck Adams #312 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 Vincent Spadea #98 Match data Feb 21, 1996* R64 Memphis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Chuck Adams #43 7-6(9) 2-6 6-4 Vincent Spadea #77 Match data Jan 14, 1995* SF ASB Classic ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chuck Adams #1,366 #34 933 1,790 83 93 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 311 350 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Chuck Adams Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–2 0.0% #417 1,476 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,482 0 0
1990 2–3 40.0% #193 1,489 0 0 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
1991 10–12 45.5% #117 1,573 0 0 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
1992 9–15 37.5% #112 1,586 0 0 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
1993 25–25 50.0% #69 1,696 0 1 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
1994 26–24 52.0% #44 1,735 0 1 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,753 0 0
1995 6–5 54.5% #224 1,692 0 1 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
1996 5–7 41.7% #278 1,618 0 1 2000 3–24 11.1% #213 1,540 0 0
— — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,530 0 0
— — — — — — — 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,622 0 0
— — — — — — — 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
— — — — — — — 2004 40–26 60.6% #20 1,783 0 1
— — — — — — — 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
— — — — — — — 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,626 0 1
— — — — — — — 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,651 0 1
— — — — — — — 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,643 0 1
— — — — — — — 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,520 0 1
— — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,475 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Chuck Adams Vincent Spadea
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1991 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1992 9 14 23 39.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 15 12 27 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
1993 20 16 36 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1994 20 15 35 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1998 19 17 36 52.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
1995 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 17 12 29 58.6% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
1996 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 15 16 6.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 8 9 17 47.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 24 16 40 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 24 14 38 63.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 14 17 31 45.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 68 66 134 50.7% 1 11 12 8.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 11 9 20 55.0% Career 198 204 402 49.3% 68 84 152 44.7% 27 39 66 40.9% 18 23 41 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Chuck Adams Vincent Spadea
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1989 1477 102.1 — — — — — — — 16.7% -0.84 0–1 0–2 — +0.05 1993 1483 111.6 -2.02 +0.71 0.780 44.9% +25 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.51
1990 1489 106.0 — — — — +43 — — 41.7% -0.33 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 1994 1562 128.2 -4.35 +0.98 0.897 47.7% -7 -11 — 49.1% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.31
1991 1574 124.7 — — — — +39 — — 44.2% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.24 1995 1640 140.5 -0.53 +2.71 1.040 50.5% +51 -56 -95 46.2% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.18
1992 1586 122.1 — — — — +32 — — 42.9% -0.55 0–5 (0%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.11 1996 1712 143.3 +1.24 +2.99 1.130 52.3% +32 -80 -144 55.5% +0.52 3–10 (23%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.21
1993 1697 140.4 — — — — +48 -235 -174 52.3% +0.10 8–13 (38%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.71 1997 1695 132.3 -1.99 +0.58 0.942 49.0% +54 -90 -177 44.2% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 8–13 (38%) — +0.15
1994 1736 140.3 — — — — +27 -304 -159 50.8% -0.04 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.79 1998 1754 142.9 -1.19 +1.36 0.948 49.0% +12 -114 -242 48.9% -0.21 11–9 (55%) 11–7 (61%) — -1.59
1995 1693 114.2 — — — — +57 -259 — 54.5% -0.55 2–0 6–1 (86%) — +1.01 1999 1764 147.3 +0.64 +3.01 1.078 51.4% 0 +23 — 52.6% +0.40 11–8 (58%) 12–17 (41%) — -2.07
1996 1619 115.7 — — — — +42 — — 47.2% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +1.07 2000 1541 116.0 -3.77 -2.37 0.776 45.7% +4 +136 -111 25.7% -1.37 2–10 (17%) 1–5 (17%) — -1.41
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1530 100.5 -1.18 -1.97 0.837 46.8% +9 — — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 — — -0.11
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1623 124.7 -0.85 -0.17 0.959 49.0% -26 +7 -149 44.3% -0.30 5–3 (63%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.52
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1724 136.8 -0.66 +1.93 1.022 50.6% +8 -47 — 51.0% +0.20 14–4 (78%) 3–11 (21%) — +3.85
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1783 145.9 -0.01 +2.69 1.050 51.0% +7 -99 -180 57.4% +0.58 17–7 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.56
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1666 133.6 -2.19 +2.07 0.982 49.7% -7 +10 +9 49.5% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.81
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1627 135.4 -0.44 +2.72 1.054 51.1% +39 -19 -31 42.6% -0.10 6–10 (38%) 4–13 (24%) — +0.49
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1651 138.5 -1.80 +0.82 0.961 49.3% +13 -57 -80 44.9% -0.17 10–5 (67%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.61
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1644 128.2 -2.08 -1.45 0.903 48.3% +10 -100 +32 42.9% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.90
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1521 107.0 -4.53 -2.50 0.746 44.4% +14 — +119 19.2% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — +0.54
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1475 95.4 -1.09 -2.14 0.406 37.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14
Career 1790 136.5 — — — — +38 -266 -167 48.6% -0.15 25–32 (44%) 39–39 (50%) 99.0 +1.05 Career 1877 141.6 -1.05 +1.51 0.987 49.8% +15 -37 -86 47.2% -0.06 108–104 (51%) 98–134 (42%) 95.1 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.