H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Chuck Adams vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-0
Chuck Adams holds a 2–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chuck Adams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chuck Adams won the 1996 Memphis second round 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1996* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Chuck Adams | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1995* | Auckland | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Chuck Adams | 7-6(9) 2-6 6-4 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chuck Adams | #1,366 | #34 | 933 | 1,789 | 83 | 93 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chuck Adams | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #224 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #278 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |