H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Claudio Mezzadri vs Miloslav Mecir H2H: 0-2
Miloslav Mecir holds a 2–0 lead over Claudio Mezzadri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miloslav Mecir leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miloslav Mecir won the 1988 Rotterdam quarterfinal 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1988* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Miloslav Mecir | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Claudio Mezzadri | Match data |
| May 19, 1985* | Rome | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Miloslav Mecir | 6-1 6-2 | Claudio Mezzadri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudio Mezzadri | #1,238 | #26 | 539 | 1,795 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Miloslav Mecir | #116 | #4 | 677 | 2,179 | 232 | 108 | 68.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudio Mezzadri | Miloslav Mecir | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #831 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #151 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #135 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #50 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #28 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,938 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #105 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 68–18 | 79.1% | #6 | 1,977 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #230 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #97 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #134 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |