H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Claudio Panatta vs Peter Feigl H2H: 0-2
Peter Feigl holds a 2–0 lead over Claudio Panatta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Feigl leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Peter Feigl won the 1982 Buenos Aires third round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1982* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Peter Feigl | 6-2 7-6 | Claudio Panatta | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1982* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Peter Feigl | 6-3 6-4 | Claudio Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudio Panatta | #1,038 | #46 | 18 | 1,748 | 100 | 135 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Feigl | #470 | #35 | 0 | 1,794 | 107 | 113 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudio Panatta | Peter Feigl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #482 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #76 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #121 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #272 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #153 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #45 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #132 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #75 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #557 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #93 | 1,539 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #137 | 1,583 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |