H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Claudio Panatta vs Shlomo Glickstein H2H: 0-1
Shlomo Glickstein holds a 1–0 lead over Claudio Panatta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shlomo Glickstein leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shlomo Glickstein won the 1983 Bournemouth third round 3-6 7-6 3-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 68
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1983* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Shlomo Glickstein | 3-6 7-6 3-0 (ret.) | Claudio Panatta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudio Panatta | #1,038 | #46 | 18 | 1,748 | 100 | 135 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Shlomo Glickstein | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,864 | 159 | 147 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudio Panatta | Shlomo Glickstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #482 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #76 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #34 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #121 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #153 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #167 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #132 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #557 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |