H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Claudio Pistolesi vs Damir Keretic H2H: 0-1
Damir Keretic holds a 1–0 lead over Claudio Pistolesi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1987 Hamburg second round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1987* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Claudio Pistolesi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudio Pistolesi | #1,367 | #71 | 436 | 1,666 | 75 | 109 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudio Pistolesi | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #211 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #179 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #97 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #95 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #183 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |