H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Claudio Pistolesi vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 1-0
Claudio Pistolesi holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Lundgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudio Pistolesi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudio Pistolesi won the 1988 Monte Carlo second round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1988* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Claudio Pistolesi | 6-3 7-6 | Peter Lundgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudio Pistolesi | #1,367 | #71 | 436 | 1,666 | 75 | 109 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudio Pistolesi | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #211 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #179 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #97 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #95 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #183 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 |