H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Claudio Pistolesi vs Sergio Casal H2H: 1-1
Claudio Pistolesi and Sergio Casal are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sergio Casal leads 1–0 on carpet, while Claudio Pistolesi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sergio Casal won the 1988 Milan third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1988* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sergio Casal | 6-3 6-2 | Claudio Pistolesi | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1985* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Claudio Pistolesi | 7-6 6-4 | Sergio Casal | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudio Pistolesi | #1,367 | #71 | 436 | 1,666 | 75 | 109 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sergio Casal | #1,267 | #31 | 122 | 1,793 | 110 | 137 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudio Pistolesi | Sergio Casal | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #211 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #179 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #97 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #95 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #177 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #62 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #92 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #183 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #263 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #623 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #973 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |