H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Claudio Pistolesi vs Tarik Benhabiles H2H: 1-2
Tarik Benhabiles holds a 2–1 lead over Claudio Pistolesi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tarik Benhabiles leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Tarik Benhabiles won the 1990 Prague fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1990* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tarik Benhabiles | 6-3 6-3 | Claudio Pistolesi | Match data |
| Jun 22, 1990* | Genova | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tarik Benhabiles | 5-7 6-4 7-6 | Claudio Pistolesi | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1987* | Athens | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Claudio Pistolesi | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Tarik Benhabiles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudio Pistolesi | #1,367 | #71 | 436 | 1,666 | 75 | 109 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tarik Benhabiles | #1,262 | #22 | 387 | 1,767 | 69 | 105 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudio Pistolesi | Tarik Benhabiles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #211 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #179 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #616 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #97 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #71 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #95 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #230 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #183 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #107 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #177 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |