H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cliff Drysdale vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 1-2
Andres Gimeno holds a 2–1 lead over Cliff Drysdale in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andres Gimeno leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Cliff Drysdale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cliff Drysdale won the 1971 Rome fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 85
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1971* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Cliff Drysdale | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1971* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andres Gimeno | 6-2 6-4 6-0 | Cliff Drysdale | Match data |
| May 17, 1970* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andres Gimeno | 8-6 6-2 | Cliff Drysdale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cliff Drysdale | #423 | #13 | 0 | 2,134 | 402 | 253 | 61.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Andres Gimeno | #150 | #49 | 0 | 2,038 | 246 | 131 | 65.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cliff Drysdale | Andres Gimeno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 27 | 1968 | 53–37 | 58.9% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1969 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1970 | 45–25 | 64.3% | — | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1971 | 76–29 | 72.4% | — | 1,997 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 48–27 | 64.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1972 | 51–29 | 63.8% | — | 1,935 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1973 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1974 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #18 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 45–26 | 63.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1975 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #36 | 1,827 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 53–23 | 69.7% | — | 1,899 | 1 | 12 |
| 35 | 1976 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #136 | 1,792 | 1 | 12 |
| 36 | 1977 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1978 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #47 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #217 | 1,710 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,707 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |