H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cliff Richey vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 2-1
Cliff Richey holds a 2–1 lead over Andres Gimeno in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cliff Richey leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Andres Gimeno leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1972 Johannesburg semifinal 3-6 6-1 5-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1972* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Cliff Richey | 3-6 6-1 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1971* | Washington Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andres Gimeno | 6-1 7-6 | Cliff Richey | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1970* | Stockholm Open | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cliff Richey | 23-21 6-1 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Andres Gimeno | #150 | #49 | 0 | 2,038 | 246 | 131 | 65.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cliff Richey | Andres Gimeno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 | 1968 | 48–27 | 64.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 | 1969 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 45–26 | 63.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 53–23 | 69.7% | — | 1,899 | 1 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #136 | 1,792 | 1 | 12 |