H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Cliff Richey vs Bob Lutz H2H: 5-5

Cliff Richey and Bob Lutz are tied 5–5 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Bob Lutz leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Cliff Richey leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bob Lutz won the 1978 Stowe quarterfinal 4-6 7-6 6-1.

USA Age 79 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 5
10 main draw meetings
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bob Lutz 4-6 7-6 6-1 Cliff Richey Match data Aug 19, 1978* QF Stowe ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 6-7 7-5 7-6 Cliff Richey #30 Match data Feb 20, 1977* QF Ocean City ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 6-2 6-3 Cliff Richey Match data Sep 19, 1975* R16 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Cliff Richey 6-2 6-3 Bob Lutz Match data Mar 28, 1975* R16 Atlanta Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Cliff Richey #25 1-6 6-2 6-3 Bob Lutz Match data Jan 24, 1975* R16 Philadelphia Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Cliff Richey #28 7-6(4) 6-1 Bob Lutz Match data Apr 25, 1974* R32 St. Louis ATP 250 Clay
Bob Lutz 7-5 7-6(1) Cliff Richey Match data Jan 20, 1973* QF Miami Open ATP 250 Hard
Cliff Richey 4-6 6-0 6-4 Bob Lutz Match data Jul 15, 1972* R32 Washington Open ATP 250 Clay
Cliff Richey 6-2 1-0 (ret.) Bob Lutz Match data Jul 13, 1972* R16 Bretton Woods ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 6-3 6-2 6-2 Cliff Richey Match data Aug 21, 1968* R16 Boston 2 ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cliff Richey #662 #16 0 2,115 485 222 68.6% 0 0 0 0 21 21
Bob Lutz 2,053 388 272 58.8% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cliff Richey Bob Lutz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1968 23–15 60.5% 1,707 0 0
21 1968 46–15 75.4% 1,738 0 1 1969 24–16 60.0% 1,845 0 0
22 1969 64–18 78.0% 1,948 0 7 1970 23–18 56.1% 1,855 0 2
23 1970 88–24 78.6% 2,045 0 12 1971 45–25 64.3% 1,992 0 4
24 1971 67–23 74.4% 1,910 0 15 1972 36–29 55.4% 1,912 0 5
25 1972 54–24 69.2% 1,958 0 18 1973 16–14 53.3% 1,841 0 5
26 1973 47–26 64.4% #19 1,848 0 18 1974 15–18 45.5% 1,745 0 5
27 1974 24–15 61.5% #23 1,907 0 19 1975 36–19 65.5% 1,875 0 6
28 1975 35–23 60.3% #32 1,857 0 19 1976 27–17 61.4% 1,926 0 6
29 1976 33–24 57.9% #28 1,861 0 20 1977 36–22 62.1% 1,833 0 6
30 1977 14–17 45.2% #87 1,720 0 20 1978 28–16 63.6% 1,917 0 7
31 1978 13–12 52.0% #57 1,709 0 21 1979 23–13 63.9% 1,889 0 8
32 1979 0–1 0.0% #662 1,697 0 21 1980 33–17 66.0% 1,952 0 11
33 1981 10–13 43.5% 1,788 0 11
34 1982 6–15 28.6% 1,698 0 11
35 1983 3–3 50.0% 1,698 0 11
36 1984 3–1 75.0% 1,740 0 11
37 1985 1–1 50.0% 1,742 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cliff Richey Bob Lutz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1968 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1969 23 5 28 82.1% 27 7 34 79.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1970 12 11 23 52.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1970 26 7 33 78.8% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 15 8 23 65.2% 1971 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1971 26 7 33 78.8% 20 7 27 74.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 22 16 38 57.9%
25 1972 22 8 30 73.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 19 12 31 61.3% 1973 6 4 10 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 1973 9 5 14 64.3% 15 10 25 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 1974 5 5 10 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1974 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1975 15 8 23 65.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 17 6 23 73.9%
28 1975 8 7 15 53.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 6 18 66.7% 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
29 1976 12 7 19 63.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 1977 9 9 18 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
30 1977 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1978 14 5 19 73.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
31 1978 9 5 14 64.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
32 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 22 8 30 73.3% 1 0 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
33 1981 7 8 15 46.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
34 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
35 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
36 1984 3 1 4 75.0%
37 1985 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 163 65 228 71.5% 161 64 225 71.6% 54 24 78 69.2% 107 69 176 60.8% 145 103 248 58.5% 54 47 101 53.5% 68 40 108 63.0% 121 82 203 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cliff Richey Bob Lutz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1968 1708 127.8 -52 -164 +67 59.8% +0.80 4–5 (44%) -2.16
21 1968 1739 120.9 +76 -1 -80 68.3% +1.05 12–4 (75%) +2.22 1969 1846 130.9 -50 -320 +54 53.3% +0.29 10–3 (77%) -1.31
22 1969 1948 136.7 +130 +23 -163 69.5% +1.45 14–3 (82%) +2.23 1970 1855 135.8 -25 +52 56.6% +0.49 4–8 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 95.6 -0.30
23 1970 2046 149.9 +78 +58 -164 73.0% +1.54 16–7 (70%) 6–3 (67%) 105.3 -0.55 1971 1992 148.4 +23 -288 -66 59.7% +0.74 12–8 (60%) 9–10 (47%) 102.7 -4.07
24 1971 1911 147.5 +121 +58 +23 70.5% +1.44 11–13 (46%) 13–6 (68%) 96.4 +4.89 1972 1913 151.7 +8 -156 +37 56.2% +0.37 12–14 (46%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 -4.12
25 1972 1958 154.4 +25 +29 +43 64.0% +1.09 16–12 (57%) 15–12 (56%) 100.7 -3.20 1973 1841 135.1 +30 57.1% +0.44 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -1.03
26 1973 1849 146.1 +101 -3 +122 61.0% +0.95 13–11 (54%) 14–11 (56%) 97.7 -1.67 1974 1745 137.0 +68 -31 +144 42.5% -0.23 3–4 (43%) 7–9 (44%) 96.4 -2.71
27 1974 1908 152.6 +81 -72 +58 59.8% +0.95 8–7 (53%) 9–8 (53%) 101.2 -3.69 1975 1875 152.4 +83 -147 63.6% +1.08 7–4 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 -0.90
28 1975 1858 145.3 +59 -38 +101 56.6% +0.54 14–10 (58%) 8–7 (53%) 99.1 -3.96 1976 1926 158.4 +60 -149 -54 56.3% +0.54 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 102.0 -4.63
29 1976 1861 149.1 -31 +42 57.8% +0.65 8–8 (50%) 8–10 (44%) 96.3 -1.58 1977 1833 152.1 +43 -24 +83 58.8% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 7–10 (41%) 99.8 -3.05
30 1977 1720 132.8 +62 +54 47.8% -0.14 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) 100.6 +1.06 1978 1917 150.2 +30 -70 61.5% +0.80 8–5 (62%) 7–7 (50%) 100.3 -2.30
31 1978 1710 129.8 +66 50.0% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 100.7 +0.66 1979 1890 140.1 +29 -26 63.9% +1.27 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 94.4 +0.36
32 1979 1698 102.8 0.0% -3.00 -0.06 1980 1952 152.7 +46 -133 61.7% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.36
33 1981 1789 132.9 +6 47.3% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 96.4 -1.03
34 1982 1698 127.1 +10 +75 31.4% -1.04 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.4 -1.57
35 1983 1698 117.4 +8 53.8% +0.46 1–0 0–1 +0.55
36 1984 1740 119.9 +6 66.7% +0.44 1–0 1–0 -0.67
37 1985 1742 103.0 50.0% -1.25 1–0 -0.35
Career 2116 148.8 +70 +24 -48 64.7% +1.06 121–84 (59%) 84–66 (56%) 104.1 -0.52 2053 152.2 +26 -133 +21 56.9% +0.55 106–87 (55%) 75–86 (47%) 96.1 -4.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.