H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cliff Richey vs Fred Stolle H2H: 2-1
Cliff Richey holds a 2–1 lead over Fred Stolle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cliff Richey leads 2–0 on clay, while Fred Stolle leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1972 Charlotte Wct fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1972* | Charlotte Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Cliff Richey | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Fred Stolle | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1970 | Cambridge | ATP 250 | RR | Clay | Cliff Richey | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Fred Stolle | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1969* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Fred Stolle | 7-5 6-8 6-4 7-5 | Cliff Richey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Fred Stolle | #555 | #30 | 0 | 1,923 | 177 | 168 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cliff Richey | Fred Stolle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 | 1968 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 | 1969 | 48–31 | 60.8% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 | 1970 | 19–23 | 45.2% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 | 1971 | 24–26 | 48.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 22–29 | 43.1% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,772 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,754 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #305 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,734 | 0 | 6 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 6 |