H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Colin Dibley vs Bob Lutz H2H: 1-6

Bob Lutz holds a 6–1 lead over Colin Dibley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Bob Lutz leads 3–0 on grass and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Bob Lutz won the 1978 Colombus round of 32 6-4 6-3.

AUS Age 81 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 6
7 main-draw meetings
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bob Lutz 6-4 6-3 Colin Dibley #58 Match data Aug 10, 1978* R32 Colombus ATP 250 Clay
Colin Dibley #37 6-4 6-4 Bob Lutz Match data Oct 6, 1977* R32 Maui ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 6-2 6-1 Colin Dibley #48 Match data Jun 10, 1977* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Bob Lutz 6-1 6-0 Colin Dibley #108 Match data May 15, 1975* R32 Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 3-6 6-4 6-2 Colin Dibley Match data Jan 18, 1973* R32 Miami Open ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 6-4 6-2 6-2 Colin Dibley Match data Sep 1, 1972* R128 US Open Grand Slam Grass
Bob Lutz 9-7 8-10 6-3 Colin Dibley Match data Jun 5, 1970* R16 Manchester ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Colin Dibley #240 #33 0 1,877 341 310 52.4% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Bob Lutz 2,053 388 272 58.8% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Colin Dibley Bob Lutz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1968 23–15 60.5% 1,707 0 0
21 1969 24–16 60.0% 1,845 0 0
22 1970 23–18 56.1% 1,855 0 2
23 1968 3–2 60.0% 1,521 0 0 1971 45–25 64.3% 1,992 0 4
24 1972 36–29 55.4% 1,912 0 5
25 1970 7–10 41.2% 1,526 0 0 1973 16–14 53.3% 1,841 0 5
26 1971 41–21 66.1% 1,753 0 1 1974 15–18 45.5% 1,745 0 5
27 1972 52–30 63.4% 1,819 0 2 1975 36–19 65.5% 1,875 0 6
28 1973 35–31 53.0% #39 1,694 0 4 1976 27–17 61.4% 1,926 0 6
29 1974 35–35 50.0% #87 1,692 0 4 1977 36–22 62.1% 1,833 0 6
30 1975 18–28 39.1% #94 1,624 0 4 1978 28–16 63.6% 1,917 0 7
31 1976 39–40 49.4% #85 1,636 0 4 1979 23–13 63.9% 1,889 0 8
32 1977 52–33 61.2% #35 1,780 0 4 1980 33–17 66.0% 1,952 0 11
33 1978 18–28 39.1% #115 1,629 0 4 1981 10–13 43.5% 1,788 0 11
34 1979 20–22 47.6% #116 1,700 0 4 1982 6–15 28.6% 1,698 0 11
35 1980 18–23 43.9% #57 1,651 0 5 1983 3–3 50.0% 1,698 0 11
36 1981 3–7 30.0% #99 1,633 0 5 1984 3–1 75.0% 1,740 0 11
37 1985 1–1 50.0% 1,742 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Colin Dibley Bob Lutz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1968 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1970 12 11 23 52.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1968 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1971 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 22 16 38 57.9%
25 1970 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1973 6 4 10 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 1971 14 9 23 60.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 1974 5 5 10 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1972 9 10 19 47.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 20 9 29 69.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1975 15 8 23 65.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 17 6 23 73.9%
28 1973 14 9 23 60.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
29 1974 6 11 17 35.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 1977 9 9 18 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
30 1975 2 9 11 18.2% 12 11 23 52.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1978 14 5 19 73.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
31 1976 7 7 14 50.0% 12 19 31 38.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
32 1977 16 10 26 61.5% 11 9 20 55.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 1980 22 8 30 73.3% 1 0 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
33 1978 5 7 12 41.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 9 12 25.0% 1981 7 8 15 46.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
34 1979 9 7 16 56.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
35 1980 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
36 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 3 1 4 75.0%
37 1985 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 86 91 177 48.6% 79 81 160 49.4% 119 74 193 61.7% 57 64 121 47.1% 145 103 248 58.5% 54 47 101 53.5% 68 40 108 63.0% 121 82 203 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Colin Dibley Bob Lutz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1968 1708 127.8 -52 -164 +67 59.8% +0.80 4–5 (44%) -2.16
21 1969 1846 130.9 -50 -320 +54 53.3% +0.29 10–3 (77%) -1.31
22 1970 1855 135.8 -25 +52 56.6% +0.49 4–8 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 95.6 -0.30
23 1968 1521 100.4 +15 50.0% +0.07 3–1 (75%) -0.01 1971 1992 148.4 +23 -288 -66 59.7% +0.74 12–8 (60%) 9–10 (47%) 102.7 -4.07
24 1972 1913 151.7 +8 -156 +37 56.2% +0.37 12–14 (46%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 -4.12
25 1970 1527 119.6 +43 41.3% -0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 +0.99 1973 1841 135.1 +30 57.1% +0.44 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -1.03
26 1971 1753 136.2 -77 -90 +64 64.2% +0.99 7–6 (54%) 11–7 (61%) 106.7 +3.94 1974 1745 137.0 +68 -31 +144 42.5% -0.23 3–4 (43%) 7–9 (44%) 96.4 -2.71
27 1972 1820 133.4 -107 +19 +44 61.8% +0.85 10–11 (48%) 9–12 (43%) 95.0 +4.65 1975 1875 152.4 +83 -147 63.6% +1.08 7–4 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 -0.90
28 1973 1694 131.3 -6 +47 +143 52.4% +0.23 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) 96.7 +1.46 1976 1926 158.4 +60 -149 -54 56.3% +0.54 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 102.0 -4.63
29 1974 1692 131.7 -39 +7 +124 49.4% +0.02 13–12 (52%) 14–11 (56%) 101.3 +2.15 1977 1833 152.1 +43 -24 +83 58.8% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 7–10 (41%) 99.8 -3.05
30 1975 1624 129.4 -25 +67 +117 38.1% -0.72 7–2 (78%) 3–9 (25%) 99.6 -1.23 1978 1917 150.2 +30 -70 61.5% +0.80 8–5 (62%) 7–7 (50%) 100.3 -2.30
31 1976 1637 139.9 +133 -89 +109 48.1% +0.14 14–12 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 97.7 +4.03 1979 1890 140.1 +29 -26 63.9% +1.27 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 94.4 +0.36
32 1977 1780 143.5 +35 -122 +37 56.9% +0.58 18–9 (67%) 14–13 (52%) 106.4 +0.53 1980 1952 152.7 +46 -133 61.7% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.36
33 1978 1630 137.5 +25 +44 +130 40.0% -0.38 6–8 (43%) 4–15 (21%) 89.4 -1.58 1981 1789 132.9 +6 47.3% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 96.4 -1.03
34 1979 1700 131.0 -66 -72 +117 48.6% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 10–12 (45%) 99.9 +1.79 1982 1698 127.1 +10 +75 31.4% -1.04 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.4 -1.57
35 1980 1651 129.6 -49 +147 48.6% -0.15 4–10 (29%) 6–4 (60%) 93.6 +0.75 1983 1698 117.4 +8 53.8% +0.46 1–0 0–1 +0.55
36 1981 1633 118.6 -7 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 -0.30 1984 1740 119.9 +6 66.7% +0.44 1–0 1–0 -0.67
37 1985 1742 103.0 50.0% -1.25 1–0 -0.35
Career 1878 138.6 -9 -23 +90 51.8% +0.23 102–92 (53%) 102–120 (46%) 97.5 +2.65 2053 152.2 +26 -133 +21 56.9% +0.55 106–87 (55%) 75–86 (47%) 96.1 -4.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.