H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Colin Dibley vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 1-2
Ion Tiriac holds a 2–1 lead over Colin Dibley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1974 Bologna Wct quarterfinal 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1974* | Bologna Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Ion Tiriac | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Colin Dibley | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1973* | South Orange | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Colin Dibley | 7-6 3-6 6-3 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1968* | Cannes | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 3-6 9-7 6-1 | Colin Dibley | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin Dibley | #240 | #33 | 0 | 1,875 | 338 | 310 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Colin Dibley | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 41–21 | 66.1% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 52–30 | 63.4% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 35–31 | 53.0% | #39 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 35–36 | 49.3% | #87 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1975 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #94 | 1,606 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1976 | 39–39 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,655 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1977 | 52–33 | 61.2% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1978 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1979 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #116 | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #57 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | 1981 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,630 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |