H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Colin Dibley vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 3-0
Colin Dibley holds a 3–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Colin Dibley leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Colin Dibley won the 1978 Montreal / Toronto third round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1978* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Colin Dibley | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1972* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Colin Dibley | 6-2 6-4 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Jul 23, 1971* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Colin Dibley | 4-6 6-3 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin Dibley | #240 | #33 | 0 | 1,875 | 338 | 310 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Colin Dibley | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1971 | 41–21 | 66.1% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1972 | 52–30 | 63.4% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1973 | 35–31 | 53.0% | #39 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1974 | 35–36 | 49.3% | #87 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1975 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #94 | 1,606 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1976 | 39–39 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,655 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1977 | 52–33 | 61.2% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1978 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1979 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #116 | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #57 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,630 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |