H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cristiano Caratti vs Grant Connell H2H: 0-1
Grant Connell holds a 1–0 lead over Cristiano Caratti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grant Connell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1992 Memphis third round 7-6(4) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1992* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Grant Connell | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Cristiano Caratti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristiano Caratti | #836 | #26 | 932 | 1,806 | 71 | 115 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristiano Caratti | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #160 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #129 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #82 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #140 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #156 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #138 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #135 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |