H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Cristiano Caratti vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 2-1

Cristiano Caratti holds a 2–1 lead over Jimmy Connors in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cristiano Caratti leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cristiano Caratti won the 1995 Los Angeles Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cristiano Caratti
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cristiano Caratti #104 6-4 6-4 Jimmy Connors #431 Match data Aug 3, 1995* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Jimmy Connors #38 6-4 6-4 Cristiano Caratti #85 Match data Mar 4, 1992* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Cristiano Caratti #37 6-4 6-3 Jimmy Connors #961 Match data Mar 17, 1991* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cristiano Caratti #836 #26 932 1,807 71 116 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,441 1,266 298 80.9% 8 0 1 0 100 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cristiano Caratti Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,773 0 0
19 1989 1–2 33.3% #232 1,488 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,995 0 6
20 1990 5–2 71.4% #98 1,609 0 0 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,156 0 17
21 1991 22–22 50.0% #42 1,596 0 0 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,327 3 32
22 1992 7–18 28.0% #160 1,524 0 0 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,299 3 41
23 1993 1–6 14.3% #129 1,464 0 0 1976 98–9 91.6% #1 2,386 4 53
24 1994 8–11 42.1% #82 1,543 0 0 1977 70–16 81.4% #1 2,342 4 61
25 1995 12–17 41.4% #140 1,613 0 0 1978 68–7 90.7% #1 2,385 5 71
26 1996 8–15 34.8% #156 1,566 0 0 1979 79–13 85.9% #2 2,309 5 79
27 1997 1–6 14.3% #138 1,511 0 0 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,208 5 85
28 1998 3–3 50.0% #159 1,531 0 0 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,169 5 89
29 1999 1–3 25.0% #213 1,527 0 0 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,282 7 96
30 2000 1–4 20.0% #135 1,498 0 0 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,200 8 100
31 2001 1–3 25.0% #238 1,549 0 0 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,242 8 105
32 2002 0–3 0.0% #194 1,522 0 0 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,155 8 105
33 2003 0–1 0.0% #470 1,480 0 0 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,015 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,987 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,036 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,962 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,885 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,889 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,784 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,724 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,687 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,678 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,669 8 109

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cristiano Caratti Jimmy Connors
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1989 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1972 25 8 33 75.8% 18 7 25 72.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 23 7 30 76.7%
20 1990 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 46 3 49 93.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 15 4 19 78.9%
21 1991 10 10 20 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1974 20 1 21 95.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 29 1 30 96.7% 37 2 39 94.9%
22 1992 4 11 15 26.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1975 15 1 16 93.8% 22 2 24 91.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 28 4 32 87.5%
23 1993 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 20 3 23 87.0% 29 3 32 90.6% 9 1 10 90.0% 40 2 42 95.2%
24 1994 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 18 5 23 78.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 29 7 36 80.6%
25 1995 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1978 18 1 19 94.7% 13 1 14 92.9% 12 1 13 92.3% 25 4 29 86.2%
26 1996 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1979 33 3 36 91.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 28 6 34 82.4%
27 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 17 3 20 85.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 33 5 38 86.8%
28 1998 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 22 4 26 84.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 17 4 21 81.0%
29 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1982 36 4 40 90.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 13 0 13 100.0% 22 5 27 81.5%
30 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1983 25 5 30 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 14 4 18 77.8%
31 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 30 4 34 88.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 21 4 25 84.0%
32 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7%
33 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 16 6 22 72.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 33 10 43 76.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 25 6 31 80.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 67 113 40.7% 9 18 27 33.3% 3 11 14 21.4% 13 20 33 39.4% — 506 112 618 81.9% 210 61 271 77.5% 174 38 212 82.1% 376 87 463 81.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cristiano Caratti Jimmy Connors
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1480 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.19
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1558 114.8 — — — — +95 — -49 50.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.24
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1773 125.8 — — — — +96 -248 — 59.6% +0.63 9–5 (64%) 7–9 (44%) 101.4 +2.95
19 1989 1489 100.1 — — — — — +21 — 33.3% -0.83 — 1–0 — +0.46 1972 1996 147.2 — — — — +64 -226 -238 69.4% +1.26 18–15 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 102.1 +3.34
20 1990 1609 125.5 — — — — +44 — — 60.9% +0.17 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.01 1973 2156 156.4 — — — — +94 -297 -234 78.6% +2.04 14–9 (61%) 13–11 (54%) 98.3 +0.01
21 1991 1596 137.5 -2.32 +0.63 0.945 48.8% +53 +48 -41 48.0% -0.43 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) 105.4 +1.89 1974 2327 156.3 — — — — +65 -370 -5 85.9% +2.48 15–3 (83%) 15–8 (65%) 104.4 +2.36
22 1992 1525 127.4 -2.78 -1.13 0.867 47.6% +47 +80 — 34.9% -0.78 1–6 (14%) 2–6 (25%) 90.4 +0.04 1975 2299 164.9 — — — — +129 -149 -31 84.5% +2.56 12–2 (86%) 8–3 (73%) 104.2 -0.69
23 1993 1464 103.1 -3.49 -2.69 0.735 44.4% +50 — — 25.0% -1.65 1–1 0–2 — +0.52 1976 2386 175.2 — — — — +105 -35 -92 87.1% +2.45 13–4 (76%) 20–6 (77%) 108.1 -2.86
24 1994 1544 121.2 -0.92 -0.97 0.960 49.2% +31 — — 39.1% -0.63 4–2 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 102.6 +0.72 1977 2343 176.2 — — — — +110 -49 -30 79.1% +2.09 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 -3.18
25 1995 1614 132.1 -2.01 +1.02 0.958 49.1% +30 — — 41.2% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 97.8 -0.10 1978 2385 171.9 — — — — +39 -56 -52 86.1% +2.37 10–3 (77%) 7–3 (70%) 101.5 -2.85
26 1996 1566 122.3 -3.03 -0.06 0.907 48.2% +63 — — 37.0% -1.00 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +1.28 1979 2310 177.1 — — — — +78 +55 +47 77.6% +1.93 16–3 (84%) 12–8 (60%) 103.4 -4.08
27 1997 1512 106.4 -3.87 -2.11 0.684 42.1% +69 — — 12.5% -2.44 — 0–1 — +0.32 1980 2209 172.6 — — — — +168 -11 +152 78.2% +2.18 11–6 (65%) 16–12 (57%) 95.4 -2.66
28 1998 1531 111.9 -0.20 +0.25 1.029 50.3% +65 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.55 1981 2170 172.7 — — — — +131 +7 +149 76.1% +1.96 11–4 (73%) 10–8 (56%) 99.9 -3.29
29 1999 1527 105.1 -4.22 +1.72 0.749 44.1% — — — 37.5% -0.88 1–2 (33%) — — -0.01 1982 2282 171.6 — — — — +42 -144 +139 81.8% +2.33 11–2 (85%) 15–5 (75%) 105.8 -4.60
30 2000 1498 99.4 -1.64 -2.10 0.716 43.9% +72 — — 30.8% -1.85 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.02 1983 2200 169.8 — — — — +74 -86 +260 78.1% +2.05 6–2 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 102.9 -3.68
31 2001 1549 108.2 -0.83 +0.03 0.757 45.8% — — — 22.2% -1.78 — 0–1 — -0.07 1984 2243 172.5 — — — — +36 -114 +203 77.6% +1.88 14–6 (70%) 14–7 (67%) 101.2 -6.13
32 2002 1523 97.6 -1.05 -1.27 0.786 45.3% — — — 22.2% -1.89 0–1 — — +0.16 1985 2155 161.7 — — — — +58 -25 +241 74.1% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 99.0 -3.15
33 2003 1481 98.9 +0.72 -4.18 0.849 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — 0.00 1986 2015 156.9 — — — — +63 — +293 68.8% +1.35 15–5 (75%) 10–9 (53%) 96.2 -2.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1987 161.0 — — — — +39 +104 +276 67.2% +1.33 12–3 (80%) 10–11 (48%) 101.5 -1.55
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2036 157.7 — — — — +53 — +97 76.9% +1.99 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 93.7 -0.10
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1963 149.7 — — — — +100 +14 — 66.4% +1.25 6–4 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 -0.14
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1886 104.1 — — — — +80 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–2 — -0.13
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1889 146.4 -1.80 +3.12 1.005 50.1% +29 +62 +178 57.1% +0.30 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -2.82
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1785 141.4 -1.86 +2.27 0.962 49.5% +35 +121 — 51.8% +0.05 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 97.8 -2.16
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1724 107.2 -2.74 +0.29 0.890 47.1% +57 — — 37.5% -0.69 2–0 0–2 — -0.14
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1687 107.8 -2.12 +0.37 0.980 49.9% — — — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 0–1 — +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1678 102.2 -1.10 +0.01 0.912 49.1% — — +305 50.0% +0.25 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.27
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1669 100.0 +0.85 +1.29 0.725 44.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.32
Career — 1807 128.2 -2.27 -0.17 0.896 47.9% +48 +55 -41 39.9% -0.77 26–34 (43%) 32–38 (46%) 97.4 +3.06 — 2442 169.4 -1.84 +2.23 0.967 49.5% +78 -89 +40 75.9% +1.82 236–106 (69%) 218–151 (59%) 99.9 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.