H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Cristiano Caratti vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 1-0

Cristiano Caratti holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Lundgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cristiano Caratti leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cristiano Caratti won the 1991 Milan round of 32 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cristiano Caratti
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Peter Lundgren
SWE Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cristiano Caratti #79 7-6(4) 6-2 Peter Lundgren #60 Match data Feb 7, 1991* R32 Milan ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cristiano Caratti #836 #26 932 1,807 71 116 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Peter Lundgren #472 #25 619 1,867 119 136 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cristiano Caratti Peter Lundgren
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,515 0 0
19 1989 1–2 33.3% #232 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 5–2 71.4% #98 1,609 0 0 1985 8–4 66.7% #31 1,671 0 1
21 1991 22–22 50.0% #42 1,596 0 0 1986 15–22 40.5% #98 1,640 0 1
22 1992 7–18 28.0% #160 1,524 0 0 1987 28–17 62.2% #26 1,837 0 3
23 1993 1–6 14.3% #129 1,464 0 0 1988 20–21 48.8% #66 1,738 0 3
24 1994 8–11 42.1% #82 1,543 0 0 1989 12–14 46.2% #71 1,703 0 3
25 1995 12–17 41.4% #140 1,613 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% #65 1,713 0 3
26 1996 8–15 34.8% #156 1,566 0 0 1991 13–25 34.2% #138 1,609 0 3
27 1997 1–6 14.3% #138 1,511 0 0 1992 5–8 38.5% #213 1,579 0 3
28 1998 3–3 50.0% #159 1,531 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #254 1,569 0 3
29 1999 1–3 25.0% #213 1,527 0 0 1994 1–4 20.0% #386 1,534 0 3
30 2000 1–4 20.0% #135 1,498 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #384 1,535 0 3
31 2001 1–3 25.0% #238 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2002 0–3 0.0% #194 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2003 0–1 0.0% #470 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cristiano Caratti Peter Lundgren
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1991 10 10 20 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 9 10 19 47.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
22 1992 4 11 15 26.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 22 10 32 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 1993 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1994 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1995 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
26 1996 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1998 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 67 113 40.7% 9 18 27 33.3% 3 11 14 21.4% 13 20 33 39.4% — 81 73 154 52.6% 1 18 19 5.3% 17 17 34 50.0% 20 28 48 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 161/177 of Cristiano Caratti's and 50/59 of Peter Lundgren's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cristiano Caratti Peter Lundgren
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 1991 42/44 2.3 4.3 63.3% 63.4% 49.0% 51.5% 41.9% 58.2% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 22/25 1.1 2.6 65.8% 62.5% 46.1% 54.6% 37.4% 56.8% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1993 7/7 0.7 3.6 67.7% 60.3% 44.7% 59.3% 45.6% 55.1% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1994 15/19 2.9 3.3 64.2% 69.4% 46.6% 56.8% 46.4% 61.5% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1995 28/29 2.0 3.5 62.0% 65.8% 48.1% 48.9% 43.2% 59.3% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1996 21/23 1.7 2.8 60.4% 63.9% 48.4% 44.4% 41.1% 57.6% 38.4% 1991 29/38 4.6 5.1 52.7% 68.7% 47.7% 58.6% 41.7% 58.6% 35.2%
27 1997 6/7 2.8 2.7 56.6% 63.5% 32.2% 50.5% 41.9% 49.3% 34.7% 1992 13/13 5.2 4.5 49.9% 71.2% 50.6% 46.2% 36.3% 60.8% 34.3%
28 1998 5/6 1.6 2.4 66.2% 62.8% 50.8% 54.4% 48.6% 58.4% 42.8% 1993 1/1 8.0 4.0 50.0% 74.4% 53.5% 57.1% 18.2% 64.0% 37.3%
29 1999 3/4 2.7 3.7 68.8% 60.7% 32.7% 44.5% 61.6% 51.7% 36.2% 1994 5/5 4.2 4.2 52.0% 63.0% 48.2% 44.9% 30.1% 56.2% 38.3%
30 2000 4/5 1.3 1.0 68.3% 62.7% 43.2% 47.9% 21.7% 56.5% 31.1% 1995 2/2 5.0 2.0 56.8% 74.6% 66.3% 80.0% 50.0% 71.2% 34.3%
31 2001 4/4 3.5 2.5 57.8% 68.2% 50.4% 50.8% 21.7% 60.2% 30.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 3/3 5.0 4.0 59.5% 58.3% 52.9% 63.8% 24.4% 55.5% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1/1 2.0 3.0 63.0% 55.6% 29.7% 52.9% 70.0% 46.0% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 161/187 2.0 3.3 63.2% 64.1% 46.9% 51.4% 41.4% 57.7% 37.8% — 50/255 4.8 4.7 52.0% 69.1% 49.3% 54.8% 39.0% 59.5% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cristiano Caratti Peter Lundgren
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1515 107.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.11
19 1989 1489 100.1 — — — — — +21 — 33.3% -0.83 — 1–0 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 1609 125.5 — — — — +44 — — 60.9% +0.17 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.01 1985 1671 134.7 — — — — +36 — — 58.1% +0.48 4–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 -0.03
21 1991 1596 137.5 -2.32 +0.63 0.945 48.8% +53 +48 -41 48.0% -0.43 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) 105.4 +1.89 1986 1640 129.6 — — — — +37 -156 -99 41.6% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 +0.30
22 1992 1525 127.4 -2.78 -1.13 0.867 47.6% +47 +80 — 34.9% -0.78 1–6 (14%) 2–6 (25%) 90.4 +0.04 1987 1837 150.0 — — — — +48 -397 — 58.0% +0.66 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) 104.8 +0.26
23 1993 1464 103.1 -3.49 -2.69 0.735 44.4% +50 — — 25.0% -1.65 1–1 0–2 — +0.52 1988 1738 134.2 — — — — +24 — -181 48.5% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 95.5 -0.19
24 1994 1544 121.2 -0.92 -0.97 0.960 49.2% +31 — — 39.1% -0.63 4–2 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 102.6 +0.72 1989 1703 123.9 — — — — -64 — +20 47.1% -0.34 1–3 (25%) 5–3 (63%) 98.4 -0.44
25 1995 1614 132.1 -2.01 +1.02 0.958 49.1% +30 — — 41.2% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 97.8 -0.10 1990 1713 139.5 — — — — +23 — -6 46.8% -0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–9 (31%) 98.9 -0.25
26 1996 1566 122.4 -3.03 -0.06 0.907 48.2% +63 — — 37.0% -1.00 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +1.28 1991 1610 134.1 -1.57 -2.37 0.850 47.2% +11 -201 +101 38.8% -0.51 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 98.7 -0.36
27 1997 1512 106.4 -3.87 -2.11 0.684 42.1% +69 — — 12.5% -2.44 — 0–1 — +0.32 1992 1580 113.5 -1.29 -1.70 0.876 47.8% +29 — — 37.5% -0.44 3–1 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 98.3 +0.85
28 1998 1531 111.9 -0.20 +0.25 1.029 50.3% +65 — — 53.8% -0.08 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.55 1993 1570 104.4 +0.11 -1.94 1.034 49.0% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
29 1999 1527 105.1 -4.22 +1.72 0.749 44.1% — — — 37.5% -0.88 1–2 (33%) — — -0.01 1994 1534 101.7 -1.08 -1.39 0.875 47.1% +40 — — 25.0% -1.08 1–1 0–1 — +0.11
30 2000 1498 99.4 -1.64 -2.10 0.716 43.9% +73 — — 30.8% -1.85 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.02 1995 1536 100.9 +2.06 -2.27 1.192 52.6% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — 0–1 — +0.29
31 2001 1549 108.2 -0.83 +0.03 0.757 45.8% — — — 22.2% -1.78 — 0–1 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 1523 97.6 -1.05 -1.27 0.786 45.3% — — — 22.2% -1.89 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1481 98.9 +0.72 -4.18 0.849 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1807 128.2 -2.27 -0.17 0.896 47.9% +48 +55 -41 39.9% -0.77 26–34 (43%) 32–38 (46%) 97.4 +3.06 — 1868 140.9 -1.27 -2.09 0.872 47.6% +23 -231 -8 46.8% -0.06 32–28 (53%) 34–44 (44%) 99.2 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.