H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cyril Saulnier vs Peter Wessels H2H: 1-1
Cyril Saulnier and Peter Wessels are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cyril Saulnier leads 1–0 on carpet, while Peter Wessels leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cyril Saulnier won the 2005 Ho Chi Minh City third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005* | Ho Chi Minh City | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Cyril Saulnier | 6-2 6-4 | Peter Wessels | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2005* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Peter Wessels | 6-3 6-3 | Cyril Saulnier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyril Saulnier | #1,013 | #48 | 798 | 1,800 | 75 | 111 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Wessels | #987 | #72 | 586 | 1,715 | 43 | 58 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cyril Saulnier | Peter Wessels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #150 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #130 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #89 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #86 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #144 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #90 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #163 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |