H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
D. Crealy vs R. Laver H2H: 1-5
R. Laver holds a 5–1 lead over D. Crealy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, R. Laver leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, D. Crealy won the 1973 Las Vegas third round 6-4 6-7 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
5
6 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1973* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | D. Crealy | 6-4 6-7 6-0 | R. Laver | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1971* | Boston Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | R. Laver | 6-1 6-1 | D. Crealy | Match data |
| May 4, 1971* | Dallas Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | R. Laver | 6-2 6-1 | D. Crealy | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1971* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | R. Laver | 6-2 6-4 | D. Crealy | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1970* | London / Queen's Club | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | R. Laver | 6-1 6-4 | D. Crealy | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1969* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | R. Laver | 3-6 7-9 6-2 6-2 6-4 | D. Crealy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | D. Crealy | R. Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |