H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
D. Crealy vs V. Zednik H2H: 2-2
D. Crealy and V. Zednik are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, V. Zednik leads 2–1 on clay, while D. Crealy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, D. Crealy won the 1976 Munich third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1976* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | D. Crealy | 6-3 6-4 | V. Zednik | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1973* | Charlotte Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | V. Zednik | 6-4 6-4 | D. Crealy | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1973* | Washington Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | D. Crealy | 7-6 6-1 | V. Zednik | Match data |
| May 17, 1972* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | V. Zednik | 6-2 6-1 | D. Crealy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | D. Crealy | V. Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |