H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Dale Collings vs Robert Vant Hof H2H: 1-0

Dale Collings holds a 1–0 lead over Robert Vant Hof in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dale Collings leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dale Collings won the 1981 Queen's Club Championships round of 64 3-6 7-6 11-9.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dale Collings
AUS Age 70 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Robert Vant Hof
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dale Collings 3-6 7-6 11-9 Robert Vant Hof Match data Jun 10, 1981* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dale Collings #258 #101 0 1,575 23 43 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robert Vant Hof — — — 1,879 — — — 0 0 0 0 2 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Dale Collings Robert Vant Hof
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
1976 1–1 50.0% #248 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
1977 1–4 20.0% #366 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
1978 3–5 37.5% #144 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
1979 6–13 31.6% #101 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
1980 6–7 46.2% #211 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
1981 4–7 36.4% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
1982 2–4 33.3% — 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Dale Collings Robert Vant Hof
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1974 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
1976 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1977 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1980 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1981 4 7 11 36.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
1979 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
1980 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1981 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
1982 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career 4 5 9 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 17 28 45 37.8% 0 4 4 0.0% Career 42 43 85 49.4% 9 16 25 36.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 15 25 40 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Dale Collings Robert Vant Hof
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1974 1482 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.22 1978 1492 112.1 — — — — — +23 — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.05
1976 1522 102.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 0–1 — — -0.33 1979 1507 114.7 — — — — — — — 36.4% -1.09 0–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.60
1977 1508 116.0 — — — — — — -2 18.2% -1.82 — 2–2 (50%) — -0.07 1980 1593 123.7 — — — — -2 -34 -56 46.0% -0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 104.7 +1.15
1978 1546 111.7 — — — — — — +34 41.7% -0.96 0–1 1–0 — +0.58 1981 1667 131.2 — — — — +13 -127 -104 43.0% -0.43 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 97.9 -0.32
1979 1531 112.7 — — — — +45 -49 -1 27.9% -1.16 3–1 (75%) 3–5 (38%) 102.4 +0.57 1982 1691 125.8 — — — — +19 -146 — 54.2% +0.33 6–2 (75%) 7–5 (58%) 105.0 +3.05
1980 1542 104.2 — — — — +13 -65 +53 48.3% -0.52 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.3 +2.06 1983 1722 139.5 — — — — -34 — -63 48.6% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 8–6 (57%) 107.1 -1.98
1981 1527 107.7 — — — — — — +30 39.3% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 99.1 +0.56 1984 1580 107.4 — — — — -11 — +27 34.0% -0.87 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 95.4 +0.46
1982 1505 97.1 — — — — — — +16 40.0% -0.67 — 2–2 (50%) — +1.10 1985 1520 97.1 — — — — +10 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.84
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1498 104.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.86 0–1 — — -0.12
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1524 125.6 — — — — +5 — — 35.7% -0.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.53
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1555 113.9 — — — — +30 — -5 48.1% -0.37 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) 99.0 +0.26
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1536 95.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
Career 1575 112.7 — — — — +35 -57 +22 35.8% -0.98 5–7 (42%) 15–13 (54%) 100.9 +6.44 Career 1880 131.6 — — — — 0 -86 -41 44.1% -0.42 29–29 (50%) 38–34 (53%) 102.6 +1.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.