H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:17 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Botic van de Zandschulp H2H: 0-1
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Dzumhur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2026 Tiriac Open Presented by UniCredit Bank quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Netherlands
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2026 | Tiriac Open Presented by UniCredit Bank | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 6-3 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2021 | Acapulco | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-5 Def. | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 171 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #55 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,932 | 114 | 118 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |