H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Dzumhur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2026 Tiriac Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 6-3 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data | Apr 3, 2026 | QF | Tiriac Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-5 (def.) | Damir Dzumhur | Match data | Mar 15, 2021 | Q2 | Mexican Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #104 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 175 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 120 | 122 | 49.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #77 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,454 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #104 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | 2014 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 31 | 15 | 46 | 67.4% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2018 | 15 | 20 | 35 | 42.9% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | 2019 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | 2020 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | 2021 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2022 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 31 | 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 25.0% | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 77 | 107 | 184 | 41.8% | 49 | 55 | 104 | 47.1% | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | — | 76 | 76 | 152 | 50.0% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 306/311 of Damir Dzumhur's and 241/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | 2014 | 6/6 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 56.6% | 64.9% | 47.8% | 41.9% | 44.3% | 56.8% | 36.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 16/16 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 66.0% | 66.8% | 48.6% | 43.8% | 43.4% | 60.9% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 41/42 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 66.4% | 63.3% | 50.8% | 52.9% | 49.9% | 59.1% | 39.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 57/57 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 63.5% | 66.5% | 51.3% | 53.5% | 51.3% | 60.9% | 40.3% | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% |
| 26 | 2018 | 53/54 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 63.9% | 64.4% | 48.1% | 51.5% | 44.8% | 58.3% | 38.2% | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% |
| 27 | 2019 | 33/34 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 62.5% | 63.5% | 47.2% | 57.2% | 34.8% | 57.3% | 36.9% | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% |
| 28 | 2020 | 8/8 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 62.2% | 63.6% | 43.5% | 44.3% | 20.7% | 55.9% | 34.6% | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% |
| 29 | 2021 | 8/8 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 70.4% | 68.6% | 46.4% | 53.0% | 47.8% | 62.2% | 34.7% | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% |
| 30 | 2022 | 6/6 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 62.0% | 63.5% | 49.7% | 37.8% | 35.8% | 58.2% | 38.1% | 2026 | 39/40 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 62.0% | 73.3% | 45.7% | 64.1% | 46.5% | 62.9% | 38.8% |
| 31 | 2023 | 4/4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 73.6% | 62.2% | 51.4% | 48.2% | 39.2% | 59.2% | 42.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 61.1% | 65.6% | 42.1% | 32.8% | 54.2% | 56.4% | 35.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 42/44 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 66.7% | 61.2% | 53.4% | 58.4% | 44.2% | 58.6% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 29/29 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 65.7% | 59.8% | 48.8% | 52.1% | 39.3% | 56.1% | 38.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 306/311 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 64.7% | 63.9% | 49.6% | 52.4% | 44.2% | 58.8% | 38.5% | — | 241/243 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.7% | 47.2% | 59.5% | 41.0% | 62.3% | 37.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2011 | 1491 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 1475 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 1506 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 1597 | 118.6 | -1.97 | +0.53 | 0.844 | 46.4% | +24 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.53 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.26 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 1667 | 129.2 | -2.01 | +2.48 | 1.044 | 50.4% | -76 | +55 | — | 37.8% | -0.92 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 1741 | 141.7 | -3.80 | +2.00 | 0.953 | 49.1% | -42 | +24 | -114 | 45.2% | -0.23 | 14–8 (64%) | 5–11 (31%) | — | +0.12 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 1932 | 152.7 | -2.31 | +3.45 | 1.030 | 50.6% | +22 | -261 | — | 56.4% | +0.30 | 14–11 (56%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | +1.00 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1778 | 145.4 | -4.17 | +1.68 | 0.917 | 48.5% | 0 | -105 | -44 | 49.2% | -0.24 | 6–9 (40%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | +1.03 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 |
| 27 | 2019 | 1742 | 136.2 | -4.69 | +0.59 | 0.864 | 47.0% | -6 | -58 | -36 | 37.7% | -0.83 | 7–1 (88%) | 3–8 (27%) | — | -0.33 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 |
| 28 | 2020 | 1711 | 130.3 | -1.94 | -0.73 | 0.785 | 45.1% | -16 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.18 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.82 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 |
| 29 | 2021 | 1603 | 116.6 | -0.78 | +0.35 | 0.919 | 48.4% | +23 | +54 | — | 42.1% | -1.05 | 0–2 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.42 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 |
| 30 | 2022 | 1599 | 116.6 | -2.01 | -1.57 | 0.912 | 48.1% | +21 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.80 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | 2026 | 1767 | 145.3 | -1.13 | +2.61 | 1.048 | 51.1% | +45 | -62 | -126 | 55.0% | +0.31 | 4–8 (33%) | 15–10 (60%) | — | -0.28 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1534 | 109.2 | -1.08 | +1.46 | 1.041 | 50.4% | — | +87 | — | 44.4% | -0.22 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 1454 | 107.4 | -3.25 | -2.67 | 0.803 | 45.8% | +18 | — | — | 14.3% | -1.43 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 1673 | 137.4 | -3.88 | +1.08 | 0.927 | 48.5% | -76 | +61 | -53 | 42.7% | -0.44 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | +0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 1634 | 120.8 | -5.47 | +1.07 | 0.869 | 47.3% | -66 | +45 | — | 40.3% | -0.81 | 5–3 (63%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +1.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1952 | 138.9 | -3.52 | +1.61 | 0.934 | 48.6% | -11 | -3 | -59 | 44.4% | -0.43 | 58–50 (54%) | 50–53 (49%) | 105.0 | +0.65 | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.94 | +1.97 | 1.004 | 50.0% | +8 | -47 | -84 | 48.7% | -0.07 | 38–38 (50%) | 61–53 (54%) | 105.1 | -2.55 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jul 23, 2021 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 0 | 6 | 6 | May 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Stan Wawrinka | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 24, 2025 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 3 | 2 | 5 | Mar 27, 2021 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |