H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-0
Damir Dzumhur holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Dzumhur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Damir Dzumhur won the 2014 Australian Open second round 4-6 4-6 6-3 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Damir Dzumhur | 4-6 4-6 6-3 4-1 (ret.) | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 172 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #108 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |