H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Damir Dzumhur vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 2-0

Damir Dzumhur holds a 2–0 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Damir Dzumhur leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Damir Dzumhur won the 2017 Winston-Salem Open semifinal 1-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Damir Dzumhur
Bosnia-Herzegovina Age 34 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Kyle Edmund
Great Britain Age 31 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Damir Dzumhur #67 1-6 7-5 6-3 Kyle Edmund #45 Match data Aug 25, 2017* SF Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Damir Dzumhur #81 1-6 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 6-1 Kyle Edmund #88 Match data Jan 20, 2016* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Damir Dzumhur #104 #23 1,665 1,951 136 175 43.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kyle Edmund #703 #14 2,330 2,001 114 121 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Damir Dzumhur Kyle Edmund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2013 1–3 25.0% #376 1,509 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #194 1,473 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2015 1–5 16.7% #102 1,587 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2016 20–19 51.3% #45 1,882 0 0
22 2014 2–4 33.3% #109 1,597 0 0 2017 29–27 51.8% #50 1,875 0 0
23 2015 7–9 43.8% #82 1,667 0 0 2018 37–21 63.8% #14 1,952 0 1
24 2016 20–22 47.6% #77 1,741 0 0 2019 14–22 38.9% #69 1,769 0 1
25 2017 34–23 59.6% #30 1,932 0 2 2020 10–9 52.6% #48 1,763 0 2
26 2018 24–30 44.4% #47 1,778 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2019 13–21 38.2% #93 1,741 0 3 2022 2–3 40.0% #581 1,735 0 2
28 2020 0–8 0.0% #119 1,711 0 3 2023 0–7 0.0% #538 1,653 0 2
29 2021 3–5 37.5% #158 1,603 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2022 2–4 33.3% #186 1,598 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2023 2–2 50.0% #154 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2024 0–3 0.0% #83 1,454 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2025 18–26 40.9% #66 1,673 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2026 11–18 37.9% #104 1,634 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Damir Dzumhur Kyle Edmund
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2014 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 22 18 40 55.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 21 12 33 63.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2016 11 14 25 44.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2019 9 13 22 40.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2017 31 15 46 67.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 2020 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2018 15 20 35 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2022 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2020 0 8 8 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2023 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 4 12 16 25.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 2 7 9 22.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 107 184 41.8% 49 55 104 47.1% 10 13 23 43.5% — 78 75 153 51.0% 24 27 51 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 306/311 of Damir Dzumhur's and 230/235 of Kyle Edmund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Damir Dzumhur Kyle Edmund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 4/4 4.5 2.0 64.2% 73.6% 51.0% 74.3% 14.3% 65.6% 31.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/5 5.6 2.8 61.2% 68.8% 43.4% 53.2% 11.3% 59.5% 28.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 5/6 5.2 2.8 57.8% 62.5% 47.8% 52.4% 25.3% 56.6% 32.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 36/39 6.2 2.9 59.3% 71.8% 51.0% 57.8% 44.0% 63.3% 35.1%
22 2014 6/6 3.0 3.8 56.6% 64.9% 47.8% 41.9% 44.3% 56.8% 36.4% 2017 56/56 5.6 2.9 58.3% 74.7% 54.1% 61.2% 42.6% 65.9% 37.6%
23 2015 16/16 2.6 1.9 66.0% 66.8% 48.6% 43.8% 43.4% 60.9% 40.8% 2018 57/58 6.9 2.5 59.6% 75.7% 54.5% 66.1% 40.8% 67.3% 37.9%
24 2016 41/42 2.6 2.2 66.4% 63.3% 50.8% 52.9% 49.9% 59.1% 39.0% 2019 36/36 5.1 2.1 62.2% 72.0% 52.5% 51.4% 42.8% 64.7% 34.1%
25 2017 57/57 2.7 3.3 63.5% 66.5% 51.3% 53.5% 51.3% 60.9% 40.3% 2020 19/19 5.7 2.7 61.2% 74.4% 50.2% 68.7% 36.6% 65.0% 38.0%
26 2018 53/54 2.6 2.7 63.9% 64.4% 48.1% 51.5% 44.8% 58.3% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 33/34 2.3 2.9 62.5% 63.5% 47.2% 57.2% 34.8% 57.3% 36.9% 2022 5/5 7.2 3.4 53.3% 73.2% 39.8% 65.6% 63.3% 57.5% 33.7%
28 2020 8/8 2.5 3.8 62.2% 63.6% 43.5% 44.3% 20.7% 55.9% 34.6% 2023 7/7 3.7 3.3 56.8% 63.2% 43.7% 33.7% 31.7% 54.4% 25.2%
29 2021 8/8 1.1 2.1 70.4% 68.6% 46.4% 53.0% 47.8% 62.2% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 6/6 2.8 2.3 62.0% 63.5% 49.7% 37.8% 35.8% 58.2% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 4/4 0.5 1.0 73.6% 62.2% 51.4% 48.2% 39.2% 59.2% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 3/3 0.7 2.7 61.1% 65.6% 42.1% 32.8% 54.2% 56.4% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 42/44 1.3 2.7 66.7% 61.2% 53.4% 58.4% 44.2% 58.6% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 29/29 1.3 1.8 65.7% 59.8% 48.8% 52.1% 39.3% 56.1% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306/311 2.2 2.6 64.7% 63.9% 49.6% 52.4% 44.2% 58.8% 38.5% — 230/235 5.9 2.6 59.6% 73.2% 52.1% 60.1% 40.5% 64.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Damir Dzumhur Kyle Edmund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1500 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1510 104.9 -0.84 -2.06 0.901 48.3% — — +57 22.2% -1.22 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.13
19 2011 1491 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1474 106.7 -2.93 -2.24 0.699 44.8% +38 — — 8.3% -2.50 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
20 2012 1475 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1587 116.6 -3.20 -1.53 0.745 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.23
21 2013 1506 107.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1883 152.7 +0.52 -0.61 0.956 49.6% -23 -173 -355 51.6% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.63
22 2014 1597 118.6 -1.97 +0.53 0.844 46.4% +24 — — 26.7% -1.53 — 0–1 — -0.26 2017 1876 157.4 +2.08 +1.53 1.102 51.8% +2 -87 -353 56.3% +0.53 7–18 (28%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.39
23 2015 1667 129.2 -2.01 +2.48 1.044 50.4% -76 +55 — 37.8% -0.92 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.15 2018 1952 158.9 +3.43 +1.57 1.159 52.4% -10 -74 -299 60.5% +0.60 9–10 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.07
24 2016 1741 141.7 -3.80 +2.00 0.953 49.1% -42 +24 -114 45.2% -0.23 14–8 (64%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.12 2019 1770 148.4 +0.75 -0.44 0.966 49.4% +37 +36 -119 44.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–10 (9%) — -0.60
25 2017 1932 152.7 -2.31 +3.45 1.030 50.6% +22 -261 — 56.4% +0.30 14–11 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.00 2020 1764 146.7 +0.91 +1.13 1.084 51.3% +37 — — 52.1% +0.27 2–3 (40%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.14
26 2018 1778 145.4 -4.17 +1.68 0.917 48.5% 0 -105 -44 49.2% -0.24 6–9 (40%) 11–8 (58%) — +1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1742 136.2 -4.69 +0.59 0.864 47.0% -6 -58 -36 37.7% -0.83 7–1 (88%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.33 2022 1735 110.8 -1.90 +0.25 0.792 45.8% +26 — — 36.4% -1.09 — 1–1 — +0.12
28 2020 1711 130.3 -1.94 -0.73 0.785 45.1% -16 — — 18.2% -2.18 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.82 2023 1653 115.8 -3.22 -3.72 0.554 40.8% +59 +68 — 6.3% -2.75 0–1 0–1 — -1.04
29 2021 1603 116.6 -0.78 +0.35 0.919 48.4% +23 +54 — 42.1% -1.05 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1599 116.6 -2.01 -1.57 0.912 48.1% +21 — — 33.3% -0.80 1–1 1–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1534 109.2 -1.08 +1.46 1.041 50.4% — +87 — 44.4% -0.22 1–0 1–1 — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1454 107.4 -3.25 -2.67 0.803 45.8% +18 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 1673 137.4 -3.88 +1.08 0.927 48.5% -76 +61 -53 42.7% -0.44 9–9 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1634 120.8 -5.46 +1.04 0.869 47.3% -65 +45 — 40.3% -0.81 5–3 (63%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1952 138.9 -3.52 +1.60 0.934 48.6% -11 -3 -59 44.4% -0.43 58–50 (54%) 50–53 (49%) 105.0 +0.64 — 2002 155.4 +1.34 +0.47 1.016 50.4% +7 -64 -227 50.3% +0.06 28–46 (38%) 45–55 (45%) 88.6 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.