H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Damir Dzumhur vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 1-0

Damir Dzumhur holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Dzumhur leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Damir Dzumhur won the 2015 Croatia Open Umag first round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Damir Dzumhur
Bosnia-Herzegovina Age 34 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Rosol #145 4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 Damir Dzumhur #86 Match data Sep 16, 2019 Q2 Q St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard
Damir Dzumhur #100 6-3 6-0 Lukas Rosol #54 Match data Jul 23, 2015* R32 Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Damir Dzumhur #104 #23 1,665 1,951 136 175 43.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Damir Dzumhur Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2014 2–4 33.3% #109 1,597 0 0 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2015 7–9 43.8% #82 1,667 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 2016 20–22 47.6% #77 1,741 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2017 34–23 59.6% #30 1,932 0 2 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 2018 24–30 44.4% #47 1,778 0 3 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2019 13–21 38.2% #93 1,741 0 3 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2020 0–8 0.0% #119 1,711 0 3 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 2021 3–5 37.5% #158 1,603 0 3 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 2022 2–4 33.3% #186 1,598 0 3 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 2023 2–2 50.0% #154 1,533 0 3 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 2024 0–3 0.0% #83 1,454 0 3 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 2025 18–26 40.9% #66 1,673 0 3 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 2026 11–18 37.9% #104 1,634 0 3 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Damir Dzumhur Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2016 11 14 25 44.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 31 15 46 67.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
26 2018 15 20 35 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2020 0 8 8 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2025 4 12 16 25.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2026 2 7 9 22.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 77 107 184 41.8% 49 55 104 47.1% 10 13 23 43.5% — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 306/311 of Damir Dzumhur's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Damir Dzumhur Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 2014 6/6 3.0 3.8 56.6% 64.9% 47.8% 41.9% 44.3% 56.8% 36.4% 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2015 16/16 2.6 1.9 66.0% 66.8% 48.6% 43.8% 43.4% 60.9% 40.8% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 2016 41/42 2.6 2.2 66.4% 63.3% 50.8% 52.9% 49.9% 59.1% 39.0% 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2017 57/57 2.7 3.3 63.5% 66.5% 51.3% 53.5% 51.3% 60.9% 40.3% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 2018 53/54 2.6 2.7 63.9% 64.4% 48.1% 51.5% 44.8% 58.3% 38.2% 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2019 33/34 2.3 2.9 62.5% 63.5% 47.2% 57.2% 34.8% 57.3% 36.9% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2020 8/8 2.5 3.8 62.2% 63.6% 43.5% 44.3% 20.7% 55.9% 34.6% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 2021 8/8 1.1 2.1 70.4% 68.6% 46.4% 53.0% 47.8% 62.2% 34.7% 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 2022 6/6 2.8 2.3 62.0% 63.5% 49.7% 37.8% 35.8% 58.2% 38.1% 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 2023 4/4 0.5 1.0 73.6% 62.2% 51.4% 48.2% 39.2% 59.2% 42.5% 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 2024 3/3 0.7 2.7 61.1% 65.6% 42.1% 32.8% 54.2% 56.4% 35.0% 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 2025 42/44 1.3 2.7 66.7% 61.2% 53.4% 58.4% 44.2% 58.6% 38.4% 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 2026 29/29 1.3 1.8 65.7% 59.8% 48.8% 52.1% 39.3% 56.1% 38.1% 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%
Career — 306/311 2.2 2.6 64.7% 63.9% 49.6% 52.4% 44.2% 58.8% 38.5% — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Damir Dzumhur Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2011 1491 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 1475 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1506 107.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23
22 2014 1597 118.6 -1.97 +0.53 0.844 46.4% +24 — — 26.7% -1.53 — 0–1 — -0.26 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
23 2015 1667 129.2 -2.01 +2.48 1.044 50.4% -76 +55 — 37.8% -0.92 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.15 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 2016 1741 141.7 -3.80 +2.00 0.953 49.1% -42 +24 -114 45.2% -0.23 14–8 (64%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.12 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
25 2017 1932 152.7 -2.31 +3.45 1.030 50.6% +22 -261 — 56.4% +0.30 14–11 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.00 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09
26 2018 1778 145.4 -4.17 +1.68 0.917 48.5% 0 -105 -44 49.2% -0.24 6–9 (40%) 11–8 (58%) — +1.03 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04
27 2019 1742 136.2 -4.69 +0.59 0.864 47.0% -6 -58 -36 37.7% -0.83 7–1 (88%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.33 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39
28 2020 1711 130.3 -1.94 -0.73 0.785 45.1% -16 — — 18.2% -2.18 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.82 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09
29 2021 1603 116.6 -0.78 +0.35 0.919 48.4% +23 +54 — 42.1% -1.05 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.42 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23
30 2022 1599 116.6 -2.01 -1.57 0.912 48.1% +21 — — 33.3% -0.80 1–1 1–1 — +0.11 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96
31 2023 1534 109.2 -1.08 +1.46 1.041 50.4% — +87 — 44.4% -0.22 1–0 1–1 — -0.50 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08
32 2024 1454 107.4 -3.25 -2.67 0.803 45.8% +18 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.02 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52
33 2025 1673 137.4 -3.88 +1.08 0.927 48.5% -76 +61 -53 42.7% -0.44 9–9 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.97 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37
34 2026 1634 120.8 -5.46 +1.04 0.869 47.3% -65 +45 — 40.3% -0.81 5–3 (63%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.26 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1952 138.9 -3.52 +1.60 0.934 48.6% -11 -3 -59 44.4% -0.43 58–50 (54%) 50–53 (49%) 105.0 +0.64 — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.