H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Damir Dzumhur vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 3-5

Marco Cecchinato holds a 5–3 lead over Damir Dzumhur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Marco Cecchinato leads 4–1 on clay, while Damir Dzumhur leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Damir Dzumhur won the 2021 Umag fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Bosnia-Herzegovina Age 34 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
Italy Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2021* Umag ATP 250 R16 Clay Damir Dzumhur #127 6-3 6-1 Marco Cecchinato #82 Match data
Oct 6, 2019* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Hard Marco Cecchinato #65 7-5 6-3 Damir Dzumhur #93 Match data
Sep 26, 2019* Zhuhai ATP 250 R32 Hard Damir Dzumhur #93 5-7 6-4 6-2 Marco Cecchinato #67 Match data
Apr 16, 2019* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Marco Cecchinato #16 4-0 (ret.) Damir Dzumhur #54 Match data
Mar 23, 2019* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marco Cecchinato #16 (w/o) Damir Dzumhur #53 Match data
Apr 27, 2018* Budapest ATP 250 R16 Clay Marco Cecchinato #92 6-3 6-1 Damir Dzumhur #32 Match data
Apr 17, 2018* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Marco Cecchinato #100 6-3 6-2 Damir Dzumhur #31 Match data
Apr 22, 2016* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay Marco Cecchinato #99 6-3 7-6(3) Damir Dzumhur #82 Match data
Jan 7, 2016* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Damir Dzumhur #82 6-4 6-2 Marco Cecchinato #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Damir Dzumhur #108 #23 1,665 1,951 136 171 44.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marco Cecchinato #175 #16 2,091 1,903 79 128 38.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Damir Dzumhur Marco Cecchinato
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2013 0–1 0.0% #163 1,587 0 0
21 2014 0–3 0.0% #159 1,586 0 0
22 2014 2–4 33.3% #109 1,595 0 0 2015 0–4 0.0% #90 1,555 0 0
23 2015 7–9 43.8% #82 1,665 0 0 2016 2–10 16.7% #187 1,562 0 0
24 2016 20–21 48.8% #77 1,752 0 0 2017 1–5 16.7% #109 1,557 0 0
25 2017 34–23 59.6% #30 1,933 0 2 2018 23–23 50.0% #20 1,771 0 2
26 2018 24–30 44.4% #47 1,778 0 3 2019 14–25 35.9% #71 1,651 0 3
27 2019 13–21 38.2% #93 1,741 0 3 2020 8–13 38.1% #80 1,764 0 3
28 2020 0–8 0.0% #119 1,712 0 3 2021 16–21 43.2% #100 1,679 0 3
29 2021 3–5 37.5% #158 1,603 0 3 2022 4–7 36.4% #101 1,656 0 3
30 2022 2–4 33.3% #186 1,598 0 3 2023 11–15 42.3% #198 1,613 0 3
31 2023 2–2 50.0% #154 1,532 0 3
32 2024 0–3 0.0% #83 1,453 0 3
33 2025 18–26 40.9% #66 1,672 0 3 2026 0–1 0.0% #175 1,544 0 3
34 2026 11–15 42.3% #108 1,676 0 3