H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Peter Gojowczyk H2H: 1-1
Damir Dzumhur and Peter Gojowczyk are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2019 Marseille third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2019* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 6-2 6-4 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2018* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Damir Dzumhur | 6-4 7-6(5) | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2016 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Damir Dzumhur | 6-3 7-5 | Peter Gojowczyk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 171 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |