H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 1-0
Damir Dzumhur holds a 1–0 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Dzumhur leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Damir Dzumhur won the 2016 Istanbul third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2016* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Damir Dzumhur | 6-4 6-2 | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 171 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Teymuraz Gabashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |