H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Damir Dzumhur vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 1-3

Tomas Berdych holds a 3–1 lead over Damir Dzumhur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Damir Dzumhur leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2018 Marseille quarterfinal 7-6(4) 0-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Damir Dzumhur
Bosnia-Herzegovina Age 34 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Tomas Berdych
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Berdych #17 7-6(4) 0-0 (ret.) Damir Dzumhur #29 Match data Feb 24, 2018* QF Marseille ATP 250 Hard
Damir Dzumhur #99 6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 Tomas Berdych #7 Match data Apr 13, 2016* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Tomas Berdych #6 6-0 6-4 Damir Dzumhur #82 Match data Jan 8, 2016* R16 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Tomas Berdych #7 6-4 6-2 6-2 Damir Dzumhur #188 Match data Jan 19, 2014* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Damir Dzumhur #104 #23 1,665 1,951 136 175 43.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tomas Berdych #104 #4 5,230 2,233 599 324 64.9% 0 1 0 3 9 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Damir Dzumhur Tomas Berdych
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #113 1,525 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 15–14 51.7% #45 1,699 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2005 31–26 54.4% #24 1,871 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 2006 42–24 63.6% #13 1,933 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 2007 42–21 66.7% #14 1,909 0 3
22 2014 2–4 33.3% #109 1,597 0 0 2008 32–19 62.7% #20 1,924 0 4
23 2015 7–9 43.8% #82 1,667 0 0 2009 33–24 57.9% #20 1,888 0 5
24 2016 20–22 47.6% #77 1,741 0 0 2010 41–24 63.1% #6 1,922 0 5
25 2017 34–23 59.6% #30 1,932 0 2 2011 51–23 68.9% #7 2,082 0 6
26 2018 24–30 44.4% #47 1,778 0 3 2012 52–21 71.2% #6 2,153 0 8
27 2019 13–21 38.2% #93 1,741 0 3 2013 51–24 68.0% #7 2,081 0 8
28 2020 0–8 0.0% #119 1,711 0 3 2014 53–22 70.7% #7 2,083 0 10
29 2021 3–5 37.5% #158 1,603 0 3 2015 57–22 72.2% #6 2,111 0 12
30 2022 2–4 33.3% #186 1,598 0 3 2016 39–19 67.2% #10 2,080 0 13
31 2023 2–2 50.0% #154 1,533 0 3 2017 35–18 66.0% #19 2,029 0 13
32 2024 0–3 0.0% #83 1,454 0 3 2018 11–12 47.8% #71 1,921 0 13
33 2025 18–26 40.9% #66 1,673 0 3 2019 13–9 59.1% #104 1,873 0 13
34 2026 11–18 37.9% #104 1,634 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Damir Dzumhur Tomas Berdych
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 12 14 26 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 23 14 37 62.2% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 21 14 35 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
22 2014 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 25 14 39 64.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 21 16 37 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2016 11 14 25 44.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 25 19 44 56.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
25 2017 31 15 46 67.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 36 15 51 70.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
26 2018 15 20 35 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2012 39 14 53 73.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 36 16 52 69.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
28 2020 0 8 8 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 38 15 53 71.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 40 16 56 71.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
30 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 27 13 40 67.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
31 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2017 17 10 27 63.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 10 6 16 62.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2025 4 12 16 25.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2019 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2026 2 7 9 22.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 107 184 41.8% 49 55 104 47.1% 10 13 23 43.5% — — — — — 391 211 602 65.0% 131 79 210 62.4% 68 31 99 68.7% 9 3 12 75.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 306/311 of Damir Dzumhur's and 909/923 of Tomas Berdych's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Damir Dzumhur Tomas Berdych
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/3 13.3 4.7 56.4% 72.9% 52.7% 68.7% 29.2% 64.3% 35.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 25/29 7.5 3.8 58.1% 72.3% 47.6% 55.4% 42.0% 62.1% 37.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 57/57 7.6 2.8 57.3% 74.0% 51.4% 56.0% 44.2% 64.3% 36.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 66/66 7.6 2.8 58.6% 76.0% 52.3% 57.2% 43.6% 65.9% 38.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 62/63 7.7 2.3 58.9% 78.4% 55.0% 65.5% 48.9% 68.9% 37.7%
22 2014 6/6 3.0 3.8 56.6% 64.9% 47.8% 41.9% 44.3% 56.8% 36.4% 2008 48/51 8.0 2.1 60.3% 76.4% 55.0% 62.4% 46.9% 67.9% 38.5%
23 2015 16/16 2.6 1.9 66.0% 66.8% 48.6% 43.8% 43.4% 60.9% 40.8% 2009 57/57 6.8 2.5 58.9% 74.3% 52.7% 60.4% 39.3% 65.5% 37.5%
24 2016 41/42 2.6 2.2 66.4% 63.3% 50.8% 52.9% 49.9% 59.1% 39.0% 2010 65/65 8.1 2.4 56.4% 79.6% 56.8% 64.4% 43.0% 69.6% 40.2%
25 2017 57/57 2.7 3.3 63.5% 66.5% 51.3% 53.5% 51.3% 60.9% 40.3% 2011 73/74 6.6 2.0 58.1% 77.7% 54.4% 53.0% 43.8% 67.8% 40.5%
26 2018 53/54 2.6 2.7 63.9% 64.4% 48.1% 51.5% 44.8% 58.3% 38.2% 2012 72/73 8.5 2.3 58.8% 78.5% 55.1% 67.5% 45.3% 68.8% 39.5%
27 2019 33/34 2.3 2.9 62.5% 63.5% 47.2% 57.2% 34.8% 57.3% 36.9% 2013 74/75 8.1 2.3 58.6% 78.0% 52.4% 64.1% 43.5% 67.5% 40.0%
28 2020 8/8 2.5 3.8 62.2% 63.6% 43.5% 44.3% 20.7% 55.9% 34.6% 2014 74/75 8.2 2.6 57.5% 78.8% 54.9% 65.2% 41.6% 68.6% 39.1%
29 2021 8/8 1.1 2.1 70.4% 68.6% 46.4% 53.0% 47.8% 62.2% 34.7% 2015 79/79 7.4 2.0 56.6% 78.0% 55.5% 60.4% 48.5% 68.3% 39.9%
30 2022 6/6 2.8 2.3 62.0% 63.5% 49.7% 37.8% 35.8% 58.2% 38.1% 2016 57/58 8.4 3.0 57.1% 78.0% 50.4% 58.8% 40.7% 66.2% 36.6%
31 2023 4/4 0.5 1.0 73.6% 62.2% 51.4% 48.2% 39.2% 59.2% 42.5% 2017 53/53 7.8 2.4 57.8% 78.9% 55.1% 66.9% 51.8% 68.8% 36.1%
32 2024 3/3 0.7 2.7 61.1% 65.6% 42.1% 32.8% 54.2% 56.4% 35.0% 2018 22/23 8.2 1.9 60.3% 76.5% 50.0% 66.5% 38.8% 66.2% 37.0%
33 2025 42/44 1.3 2.7 66.7% 61.2% 53.4% 58.4% 44.2% 58.6% 38.4% 2019 22/22 6.7 2.5 59.0% 75.2% 51.5% 64.8% 39.7% 65.4% 36.8%
34 2026 29/29 1.3 1.8 65.7% 59.8% 48.8% 52.1% 39.3% 56.1% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306/311 2.2 2.6 64.7% 63.9% 49.6% 52.4% 44.2% 58.8% 38.5% — 909/923 7.8 2.5 58.1% 77.3% 53.6% 61.7% 44.3% 67.4% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Damir Dzumhur Tomas Berdych
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1526 108.9 +0.33 -1.90 0.983 49.1% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1699 136.0 +0.40 +0.09 0.997 50.0% -15 -38 — 48.1% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.26
19 2011 1491 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1871 147.6 +2.21 -0.32 1.012 50.3% -3 -159 -286 54.1% +0.29 12–11 (52%) 13–14 (48%) — -2.61
20 2012 1475 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1934 149.9 +3.95 +1.79 1.142 52.2% -25 -144 -133 59.6% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.19
21 2013 1506 107.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1909 153.2 +5.09 +1.51 1.210 53.2% -28 -81 +50 65.3% +1.03 6–5 (55%) 20–12 (63%) — +1.36
22 2014 1597 118.6 -1.97 +0.53 0.844 46.4% +24 — — 26.7% -1.53 — 0–1 — -0.26 2008 1924 157.2 +4.14 +2.63 1.197 53.0% +18 -89 +16 61.1% +0.86 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.54
23 2015 1667 129.2 -2.01 +2.48 1.044 50.4% -76 +55 — 37.8% -0.92 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.15 2009 1889 149.6 +1.93 +1.34 1.088 51.1% +8 -68 +89 56.1% +0.35 13–11 (54%) 14–8 (64%) — +1.55
24 2016 1741 141.7 -3.80 +2.00 0.953 49.1% -42 +24 -114 45.2% -0.23 14–8 (64%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.12 2010 1922 165.7 +5.92 +4.41 1.325 54.2% -60 +13 +227 62.2% +1.05 10–12 (45%) 10–15 (40%) — +0.74
25 2017 1932 152.7 -2.31 +3.45 1.030 50.6% +22 -261 — 56.4% +0.30 14–11 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.00 2011 2083 169.8 +5.45 +3.99 1.258 54.0% +29 -160 +53 69.2% +1.41 11–7 (61%) 13–7 (65%) — +2.97
26 2018 1778 145.4 -4.17 +1.68 0.917 48.5% 0 -105 -44 49.2% -0.24 6–9 (40%) 11–8 (58%) — +1.03 2012 2154 175.6 +5.87 +4.18 1.263 54.1% +29 -74 -142 66.3% +1.18 12–7 (63%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.55
27 2019 1742 136.2 -4.69 +0.59 0.864 47.0% -6 -58 -36 37.7% -0.83 7–1 (88%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.33 2013 2082 173.8 +4.74 +4.38 1.231 53.4% +45 -31 -22 67.2% +1.15 9–11 (45%) 17–17 (50%) — +0.42
28 2020 1711 130.3 -1.94 -0.73 0.785 45.1% -16 — — 18.2% -2.18 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.82 2014 2084 170.2 +4.10 +3.96 1.243 53.3% +44 -21 -19 68.2% +1.12 9–9 (50%) 9–16 (36%) — +3.87
29 2021 1603 116.6 -0.78 +0.35 0.919 48.4% +23 +54 — 42.1% -1.05 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.42 2015 2112 176.1 +5.06 +4.69 1.258 53.9% +44 +48 -47 67.7% +1.11 9–5 (64%) 24–10 (71%) — +2.13
30 2022 1599 116.6 -2.01 -1.57 0.912 48.1% +21 — — 33.3% -0.80 1–1 1–1 — +0.11 2016 2081 169.7 +3.41 +1.04 1.085 51.4% +7 +79 +38 60.9% +0.72 11–3 (79%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.93
31 2023 1534 109.2 -1.08 +1.46 1.041 50.4% — +87 — 44.4% -0.22 1–0 1–1 — -0.50 2017 2029 162.0 +4.46 +0.86 1.159 52.5% -34 +39 +113 61.1% +0.67 7–8 (47%) 16–13 (55%) — -1.68
32 2024 1454 107.4 -3.25 -2.67 0.803 45.8% +18 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.02 2018 1922 155.3 +2.29 +0.98 1.096 51.6% +93 +39 +185 53.4% +0.60 1–6 (14%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07
33 2025 1673 137.4 -3.88 +1.08 0.927 48.5% -76 +61 -53 42.7% -0.44 9–9 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.97 2019 1873 152.7 +1.30 +0.72 1.063 51.0% +63 — — 55.0% +0.40 5–3 (63%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.94
34 2026 1634 120.8 -5.46 +1.05 0.869 47.3% -65 +45 — 40.3% -0.81 5–3 (63%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1952 138.9 -3.52 +1.61 0.934 48.6% -11 -3 -59 44.4% -0.43 58–50 (54%) 50–53 (49%) 105.0 +0.64 — 2233 169.6 +4.17 +2.64 1.181 52.7% +14 -50 +11 62.3% +0.85 135–115 (54%) 200–177 (53%) 97.9 +0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.