H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Tommy Robredo
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Damir Dzumhur vs Tommy Robredo.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 171 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Tommy Robredo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 |