H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Damir Keretic vs Alejandro Ganzabal H2H: 2-1
Damir Keretic holds a 2–1 lead over Alejandro Ganzabal in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Damir Keretic leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1983 Boston second round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1983* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 7-6 7-6 | Alejandro Ganzabal | Match data |
| May 20, 1982* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 4-6 6-1 7-6 | Alejandro Ganzabal | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1982* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alejandro Ganzabal | 6-3 6-3 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alejandro Ganzabal | #599 | #58 | 0 | 1,663 | 46 | 64 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Keretic | Alejandro Ganzabal | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #215 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #99 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #63 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |