H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Damir Keretic vs Brian Teacher H2H: 0-1
Brian Teacher holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brian Teacher leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Brian Teacher won the 1986 Wimbledon first round 2-6 6-4 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Brian Teacher | 2-6 6-4 6-3 7-5 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brian Teacher | #938 | #7 | 0 | 2,043 | 338 | 237 | 58.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Keretic | Brian Teacher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #121 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #109 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #31 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #20 | 2,039 | 1 | 4 |
| 26 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #9 | 1,987 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #19 | 1,935 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,822 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #53 | 1,765 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #66 | 1,708 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #104 | 1,618 | 1 | 8 |