H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Damir Keretic vs Claudio Panatta H2H: 1-0
Damir Keretic holds a 1–0 lead over Claudio Panatta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1986 Indianapolis second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1986 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-4 6-4 | Claudio Panatta | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Claudio Panatta | #1,038 | #46 | 18 | 1,748 | 100 | 135 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Keretic | Claudio Panatta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #482 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #76 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #121 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #153 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #132 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #557 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |