H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Damir Keretic vs Henrik Sundstrom H2H: 3-1
Damir Keretic holds a 3–1 lead over Henrik Sundstrom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Damir Keretic leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1986 Stuttgart Outdoor third round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 62
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 1986* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-2 7-6 | Henrik Sundstrom | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1985* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-4 6-4 | Henrik Sundstrom | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1985* | Bastad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-3 6-3 | Henrik Sundstrom | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1984* | Geneva | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Henrik Sundstrom | 6-3 6-4 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henrik Sundstrom | #1,070 | #6 | 1 | 1,992 | 143 | 106 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Keretic | Henrik Sundstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #84 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #23 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #22 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #77 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #210 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #642 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,553 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |