H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Damir Keretic vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 2-0
Damir Keretic holds a 2–0 lead over Jay Lapidus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Damir Keretic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1986 Tokyo Outdoor third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1986* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Damir Keretic | 6-4 6-1 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
| Nov 21, 1985* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Damir Keretic | 7-6 6-2 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Keretic | Jay Lapidus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |